Mitchell T, Fletcher I
University of the West of England, Faculty of Health and Social Care, UK.
Nurse Educ Today. 1998 Feb;18(2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/s0260-6917(98)80017-8.
Progression of nurse education from apprentice to educational courses in response to demands for strengthening professional status has led to an increase of nursing research proposals at Level 3 and beyond. Accordingly, the demands on ethics committees in considering ethico-legal aspects of such proposals have also risen. Historically, this function has fallen to (medical) local research ethics committees. This paper considers one centre's response in creating a nurse-led research ethics committee to function in a symbiotic partnership with its medical counterparts. The authors consider arguments for and against such a committee, suggesting that nurse-led groups are generally more tolerant of the diversity revealed within nursing research proposals, including both quantitative and qualitative studies, than medical committees who are arguably steeped in the empirical tradition. The authors also consider the future viability of small ethics committees against the backdrop of national reorganization of nurse education. They contend that whilst organizational factors may encourage creation of regionally based multidisciplinary committees, the value of discrete local nurse-led ethics groups cannot be underestimated, and such groups should be retained.
随着对加强专业地位的需求,护士教育从学徒制发展到教育课程,这导致了三级及以上护理研究提案数量的增加。相应地,伦理委员会在审议此类提案的伦理法律方面的要求也有所提高。从历史上看,这项职能一直由(医学)地方研究伦理委员会承担。本文探讨了一个中心的应对措施,即设立一个由护士主导的研究伦理委员会,与医学同行建立共生伙伴关系。作者考虑了支持和反对设立这样一个委员会的论据,认为与可能深陷实证传统的医学委员会相比,由护士主导的小组通常对护理研究提案(包括定量和定性研究)中所揭示的多样性更为包容。作者还在全国护士教育重组的背景下,考虑了小型伦理委员会未来的可行性。他们认为,虽然组织因素可能会促使设立基于地区的多学科委员会,但独立的地方护士主导的伦理小组的价值不可低估,此类小组应予以保留。