Guerrini R, Belmonte A, Genton P
Institute of Child Neurology and Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Italy.
Epilepsia. 1998;39 Suppl 3:S2-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb05118.x.
Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may aggravate pre-existing seizures and trigger new seizure types. However, the extent and mechanisms of this problem are unclear, for several reasons. AED trials are not designed to detect worsening of seizures, severe childhood epilepsies may fluctuate in severity, and worsening of seizures may be over-hastily ascribed to the introduction of a new AED. Moreover, the seizure and the epilepsy type may have been incorrectly diagnosed. The problem is identification of true aggravation of epilepsy in the absence of overdosage or toxicity. This is a common and clinically important problem that concerns both established and newer AEDs, but the biologic mechanisms involved are unknown. An increase in seizure frequency due to overdosage has been reported with phenytoin but is rare with other AEDs. Paradoxical reaction has been reported with carbamazepine (CBZ), benzodiazepines, and vigabatrin (VGB). Exacerbation of seizures may also occur during AED-induced encephalopathy or hepatopathy. An inappropriate choice of the AED (i.e., a purely pharmacodynamic mechanism) can induce worsening when CBZ or VGB is used in absence and myoclonic seizures. Further research should determine whether seizure exacerbation is associated with the type of epilepsy or with the type of EEG abnormality. Recent evidence indicates that lamotrigine is inappropriate in severe myoclonic epilepsy. Some childhood epileptic encephalopathies have been affected by certain seizure-worsening mechanisms. Whether this is due to a predisposition in specific syndromes or to an increased risk for adverse effects in patients undergoing multiple AED manipulations is unclear. Furthermore, some syndromes are not the sum of accompanying seizure types but have unique neurobiology.
抗癫痫药物(AEDs)可能会加重已有的癫痫发作并引发新的发作类型。然而,由于多种原因,这个问题的程度和机制尚不清楚。AED试验并非旨在检测癫痫发作的恶化情况,严重的儿童癫痫在严重程度上可能会波动,并且癫痫发作的恶化可能会被过于草率地归因于引入了一种新的AED。此外,癫痫发作和癫痫类型可能被错误诊断。问题在于在没有过量用药或毒性的情况下识别癫痫真正的加重情况。这是一个常见且具有临床重要性的问题,涉及已有的和较新的AEDs,但其中涉及的生物学机制尚不清楚。据报道苯妥英钠会因过量用药导致癫痫发作频率增加,但其他AEDs则很少见。卡马西平(CBZ)、苯二氮䓬类药物和氨己烯酸(VGB)曾有矛盾反应的报道。在AED诱发的脑病或肝病期间也可能发生癫痫发作的加剧。当在失神发作和肌阵挛性发作中使用CBZ或VGB时,AED选择不当(即纯粹的药效学机制)可导致病情恶化。进一步的研究应确定癫痫发作加剧是否与癫痫类型或脑电图异常类型有关。最近的证据表明拉莫三嗪不适用于严重肌阵挛性癫痫。某些儿童癫痫性脑病受到了某些癫痫发作恶化机制的影响。这是由于特定综合征的易感性还是由于接受多种AED治疗的患者出现不良反应的风险增加尚不清楚。此外,一些综合征并非伴随发作类型的总和,而是具有独特的神经生物学特性。