Kosmala W, Spring A, Witkowska M
Katedry i Kliniki Kardiologii Akademii Medycznej we Wrocławiu.
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 1997 Nov;98(11):414-23.
Diastolic dysfunction of left ventricle appears very often in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and hypertension (HT) and is a main cause of heart failure in 30-40% of all cases. Relation between systolic and diastolic function of left ventricle (LV) is commonly known but not documented well enough. Moreover, no quantitative classification of diastolic dysfunction is still available.
To find out the relations between the parameters of systolic and diastolic function of LV in patients with CAD or HT with impaired relaxation of LV without symptoms of heart failure and to make up the quantitative classification of diastolic dysfunction in the stage of impaired relaxation of LV.
Investigations were carried out in 57 patients (mean age 55.5 +/- 11.5) with angiographically proven CAD and in 91 patients (mean age 56.3 +/- 10.6) with HT and angiographically excluded CAD, all without regional myocardial contractility abnormalities and valvular heart diseases. Control group consisted of 54 healthy subjects (mean age 55.4 +/- 11.4). During 2D echocardiography examination left ventricular end-diastolic (LVEDD) and end-systolic diameters (LVESD) and left atrial dimension (LA) were obtained. Using Doppler method transmitral inflow indices: E velocity (E), A velocity (A), E velocity integral (E-VTI), A velocity integral (A-VTI), total velocity integral (T-VTI), E deceleration time (DT), isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) and aortic flow velocity integral (Ao-VTI) were measured. Only patients with E/A < or = 1 and--to exclude pseudonormalization of mitral inflow--with DT > or = 140 ms were qualified to the study. We proposed diastolic dysfunction ratio (DDR) calculated from formula: DDR = E/A x E-VTI/T-VTI. Using AFVI, LV outflow diameter, heart rate (HR) and body surface area cardiac index (CI) was calculated.
In studied group there were significantly higher values of LA, A, IVRT, DT and lower values of E, E/A, E-VTI and DDR compared to controls. There were no significant differences between these groups in HR, LVEDD, LVESD, T-VTI and CI. No significant differences in any of studied parameters were found between subgroups with CAD and HT. Among healthy subjects in subgroup with abnormal mitral inflow pattern (E/A < or = 1) there were significantly higher values of LA, IVRT, DT and lower values of DDR than in sugroup with normal one. Both subgroups did not differ in LVEDD, LVESD, CI. In the studied group there was positive correlation between DDR and CI (r = 0.69, p < 0.001), DDR and IVRT (r = 0.71, p < 0.001), DDR and DT (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), CI and E (r = 0.34, p < 0.01), CI and IVRT (r = 0.52, p < 0.001), CI and DT (r = 0.42, p < 0.001), CI and E/A (r = 0.54, p < 0.001), CI and E-VTI (r = 0.43, p < 0.001). In the control group significant correlation was found only between DDR and IVRT (r = 0.64, p < 0.02) and between DDR and DT (r = 0.52, p < 0.02) but not between DDR and CI. Using DDR DD was divided into 3 classes: class I with DDR > 0.47, class II with 0.47 > or = 0.30, and class III with DDR < 0.30. Applying of such intervals of values of DDR determined the groups which significantly differed between themselves in CI, IVRT and DT.
(1) In patients with CAD or HT with impaired relaxation of LV without symptoms of heart failure there is relation between parameters of systolic and diastolic function of LV: the more advanced diastolic dysfunction, the more impaired systolic function. (2) In healthy subjects there is no relation between parameters of systolic and diastolic function of LV. (3) DDR is a good indicator of quantitative estimation of diastolic dysfunction in the stage of impaired relaxation of LV.
左心室舒张功能障碍在冠心病(CAD)和高血压(HT)患者中非常常见,是30%-40%心力衰竭病例的主要原因。左心室(LV)收缩和舒张功能之间的关系是众所周知的,但记录不够充分。此外,目前尚无舒张功能障碍的定量分类。
探讨无心力衰竭症状的左心室舒张功能受损的CAD或HT患者左心室收缩和舒张功能参数之间的关系,并建立左心室舒张功能受损阶段舒张功能障碍的定量分类。
对57例经血管造影证实为CAD的患者(平均年龄55.5±11.5岁)和91例经血管造影排除CAD的HT患者(平均年龄56.3±10.6岁)进行研究,所有患者均无局部心肌收缩异常和瓣膜性心脏病。对照组由54名健康受试者(平均年龄55.4±11.4岁)组成。在二维超声心动图检查期间,获取左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、收缩末期内径(LVESD)和左心房内径(LA)。使用多普勒方法测量二尖瓣血流指标:E速度(E)、A速度(A)、E速度积分(E-VTI)、A速度积分(A-VTI)总速度积分(T-VTI)、E减速时间(DT)、等容舒张时间(IVRT)和主动脉血流速度积分(Ao-VTI)。仅将E/A≤1且为排除二尖瓣血流假性正常化,DT≥140ms 的患者纳入研究。我们提出了根据公式计算的舒张功能障碍比值(DDR):DDR = E/A×E-VTI/T-VTI。使用AFVI、左心室流出道直径、心率(HR)和体表面积计算心脏指数(CI)。
与对照组相比,研究组的LA、A、IVRT、DT值显著升高,而E、E/A、E-VTI和DDR值降低。这些组之间的HR、LVEDD、LVESD、T-VTI和CI无显著差异。CAD和HT亚组之间在任何研究参数上均无显著差异。在二尖瓣血流模式异常(E/A≤1)的健康受试者亚组中,LA、IVRT、DT值显著高于正常亚组,而DDR值显著低于正常亚组。两个亚组的LVEDD、LVESD、CI无差异。在研究组中,DDR与CI(r = 0.(此处原文似乎有误,推测应为r = 0.69),p < 0.001)、DDR与IVRT(r = 0.71,p < 0.001)、DDR与DT(r = 0.61,p < 0.001)、CI与E(r = 0.34,p < 0.01)、CI与IVRT(r = 0.52,p < 0.001)、CI与DT(r = 0.42,p < 0.001)、CI与E/A(r = 0.54,p < 0.001)、CI与E-VTI(r = 0.43,p < 0.001)之间存在正相关。在对照组中,仅DDR与IVRT(r = 0.64,p < 0.02)和DDR与DT(r = 0.52,p <(此处原文似乎有误,推测应为p < 0.02)之间存在显著相关性,而DDR与CI之间无相关性。使用DDR将舒张功能障碍分为3类:I类DDR > 0.47,II类0.47≥DDR≥0.30,III类DDR < 0.30。应用这样的DDR值区间确定了在CI、IVRT和DT方面有显著差异的组。
(1)在无心力衰竭症状的左心室舒张功能受损的CAD或HT患者中,左心室收缩和舒张功能参数之间存在关系:舒张功能障碍越严重,收缩功能受损越明显。(2)在健康受试者中,左心室收缩和舒张功能参数之间无关系。(3)DDR是左心室舒张功能受损阶段舒张功能障碍定量评估的良好指标。