Suppr超能文献

普通医疗环境中抑郁和焦虑障碍患病率及检出率的性别差异:世界卫生组织普通医疗心理问题合作研究报告

Sex differences in the prevalence and detection of depressive and anxiety disorders in general health care settings: report from the World Health Organization Collaborative Study on Psychological Problems in General Health Care.

作者信息

Gater R, Tansella M, Korten A, Tiemens B G, Mavreas V G, Olatawura M O

机构信息

School of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Manchester, England.

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 May;55(5):405-13. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.5.405.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding the relevance of biological and social factors to sex differences in the prevalence and detection of depressive and anxiety disorders has been impaired by the lack of standardized research methods across cultures.

METHOD

Prevalence rates of depressive and anxiety disorders were assessed using a 2-stage design from 26,969 patients attending for primary care in 15 centers from 4 continents. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine sex differences in prevalence and detection across centers.

RESULTS

Odds ratios for women compared with men of current depression (1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-1.86) and agoraphobia or panic (1.63; 95% CI, 1.18-2.20) were consistent across centers. The odds ratio for generalized anxiety varied among centers: 3 groups of centers were identified with odds ratios of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.27-0.78), 1.34 (95% CI, 1.08-1.66), and 3.09 (95% CI, 1.60-5.89). There was no sex difference in the detection of depressive and anxiety disorders by physicians across centers.

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of a sex-by-center effect for current depression and agoraphobia or panic disorder is consistent with biological and psychosocial factors, either interacting or working alone, that have a similar final effect across cultures. It does not support the idea that sex differences in prevalence are caused by local psychosocial factors that vary from country to country. The variation in the odds ratio for generalized anxiety disorder offers some support to the idea that there are local differences between the centers contributing to the sex difference in rates. Patients' sex does not appear to affect the likelihood of current depression and anxiety being detected by primary care physicians.

摘要

背景

由于缺乏跨文化的标准化研究方法,理解生物和社会因素与抑郁和焦虑障碍患病率及检出率性别差异之间的相关性受到了阻碍。

方法

采用两阶段设计,对来自四大洲15个中心的26969名初级保健患者的抑郁和焦虑障碍患病率进行评估。使用逻辑回归分析来检验各中心患病率和检出率的性别差异。

结果

各中心女性与男性相比,当前抑郁(优势比为1.60;95%置信区间[CI],1.37 - 1.86)以及广场恐惧症或惊恐障碍(优势比为1.63;95%CI,1.18 - 2.20)的优势比是一致的。广泛性焦虑的优势比在各中心有所不同:确定了3组中心,其优势比分别为0.46(95%CI,0.27 - 0.78)、1.34(95%CI,1.08 - 1.66)和3.09(95%CI,1.60 - 5.89)。各中心医生对抑郁和焦虑障碍的检出率不存在性别差异。

结论

当前抑郁、广场恐惧症或惊恐障碍不存在中心与性别的交互作用,这与生物和心理社会因素相互作用或单独起作用且在不同文化中具有相似最终效应的观点一致。这并不支持患病率的性别差异是由各国不同的当地心理社会因素导致的观点。广泛性焦虑障碍优势比的差异为各中心之间存在导致患病率性别差异的局部差异这一观点提供了一些支持。患者的性别似乎并不影响初级保健医生对当前抑郁和焦虑的检出可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验