Suppr超能文献

医疗保健覆盖类型与癌症筛查的可能性。

Type of health care coverage and the likelihood of being screened for cancer.

作者信息

Gordon N P, Rundall T G, Parker L

机构信息

Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California 94611-5714, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 1998 May;36(5):636-45. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199805000-00004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study explored whether type of outpatient health coverage affected the likelihood of men and women aged 20 to 64 years receiving recommended cancer screening procedures.

METHODS

Data from the 1989 and 1990 California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Surveys were used to compare Pap smear, mammogram, fecal occult blood test, and proctoscopic examination rates for adults with three different types of private health care coverage (Group/staff model health maintenance organization, Independent Practice Association Model health maintenance organization, indemnity plan) and no outpatient health insurance. Logistic regression models were used to control for sociodemographic and health characteristics and whether individuals had a usual health care provider.

RESULTS

Individuals with Group Model health maintenance organization coverage were significantly more likely than those with indemnity plans to have had recent cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening, whereas screening likelihood for those with Independent Practice Association model health maintenance organization coverage did not differ substantially from those with indemnity plans. Individuals with no outpatient coverage were less likely to be screened than those with outpatient coverage. The most consistently significant predictor across cancer screening procedures for both men and women was having a usual doctor who knew their medical history.

CONCLUSIONS

Adults who had private outpatient insurance were more likely to undergo recommended cancer detection procedures than those who did not. Adults who belonged to a health maintenance organization, which emphasizes and pays for a broader spectrum preventive care, were more likely to receive Pap smears, mammograms, and fecal occult blood tests than those covered by indemnity plans. Receiving care primarily from one doctor significantly increased the likelihood of having screening procedures, irrespective of type of health plan.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了门诊医保类型是否会影响年龄在20至64岁的男性和女性接受推荐的癌症筛查程序的可能性。

方法

利用1989年和1990年加利福尼亚行为风险因素监测调查的数据,比较了具有三种不同类型私人医保(团体/员工模式健康维护组织、独立执业协会模式健康维护组织、赔偿计划)的成年人以及没有门诊医保的成年人的巴氏涂片检查、乳房X光检查、粪便潜血试验和直肠镜检查率。采用逻辑回归模型来控制社会人口统计学和健康特征,以及个体是否有常规的医疗服务提供者。

结果

参加团体模式健康维护组织医保的个体比参加赔偿计划的个体近期进行宫颈癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查的可能性显著更高,而参加独立执业协会模式健康维护组织医保的个体的筛查可能性与参加赔偿计划的个体相比没有实质性差异。没有门诊医保的个体接受筛查的可能性低于有门诊医保的个体。在男性和女性的所有癌症筛查程序中,最一致显著的预测因素是有一位了解其病史的常规医生。

结论

拥有私人门诊医保的成年人比没有医保的成年人更有可能接受推荐的癌症检测程序。属于健康维护组织的成年人,该组织强调并支付更广泛的预防性护理费用,比参加赔偿计划的人更有可能接受巴氏涂片检查、乳房X光检查和粪便潜血试验。无论医保类型如何,主要由一位医生提供护理显著增加了进行筛查程序的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验