Stange K C, Flocke S A, Goodwin M A
Department of Family Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-7136, USA.
J Fam Pract. 1998 May;46(5):419-24.
The use of illness visits as opportunities to increase the delivery of preventive services has been widely recommended, but its feasibility in community practice is not known. We examined the prevalence of this opportunistic approach to providing preventive services, and the degree to which patient satisfaction and time limitation are barriers.
Consecutive patient illness visits to 138 community family physicians were directly observed. Visits by patients who received at least one preventive service recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force were compared with visits by patients not receiving any recommended preventive services, controlling for potentially confounding patient characteristics.
Among 3547 illness visits, preventive services were delivered during 39% of visits for chronic illness and 30% of visits for acute illness. Opportunistic health habits counseling occurred more frequently than screening or immunization. Visit satisfaction reported by 2454 patients using the Medical Outcomes Survey 9-item Visit Rating Scale was not different during illness visits with or without the delivery of preventive services. The duration of illness visits that included preventive services was an average of 2.1 minutes longer than illness visits without such interventions (95% confidence interval, 1.7-2.4).
The delivery of preventive services during illness visits is common in community practice and is well accepted by patients. The expansion of an opportunistic approach to providing preventive services will require attention to time-efficient approaches.
将疾病就诊作为增加预防服务提供机会的做法已得到广泛推荐,但在社区实践中的可行性尚不清楚。我们研究了这种提供预防服务的机会性方法的普遍性,以及患者满意度和时间限制作为障碍的程度。
直接观察了连续就诊于138位社区家庭医生的患者的疾病就诊情况。将接受美国预防服务工作组推荐的至少一项预防服务的患者就诊情况与未接受任何推荐预防服务的患者就诊情况进行比较,并控制潜在的混杂患者特征。
在3547次疾病就诊中,慢性病就诊中有39%、急性病就诊中有30%提供了预防服务。机会性健康习惯咨询比筛查或免疫接种更频繁。使用医疗结果调查9项就诊评分量表的2454名患者报告的就诊满意度在提供或未提供预防服务的疾病就诊期间没有差异。包括预防服务的疾病就诊时间比没有此类干预的疾病就诊平均长2.1分钟(95%置信区间,1.7 - 2.4)。
在疾病就诊期间提供预防服务在社区实践中很常见,并且患者接受度良好。扩大提供预防服务的机会性方法将需要关注高效利用时间的方法。