Bruner L H, Carr G J, Curren R D, Chamberlain M
Procter & Gamble Company, Health and Beauty Care Europe, Staines, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Apr;106 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):477-84. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106477.
Before nonanimal toxicity tests may be officially accepted by regulatory agencies, it is generally agreed that the validity of the new methods must be demonstrated in an independent, scientifically sound validation program. Validation has been defined as the demonstration of the reliability and relevance of a test method for a particular purpose. This paper provides a brief review of the development of the theoretical aspects of the validation process and updates current thinking about objectively testing the performance of an alternative method in a validation study. Validation of alternative methods for eye irritation testing is a specific example illustrating important concepts. Although discussion focuses on the validation of alternative methods intended to replace current in vivo toxicity tests, the procedures can be used to assess the performance of alternative methods intended for other uses.
在监管机构正式接受非动物毒性试验之前,人们普遍认为,新方法的有效性必须在一个独立的、科学合理的验证计划中得到证明。验证被定义为证明一种测试方法对于特定目的的可靠性和相关性。本文简要回顾了验证过程理论方面的发展,并更新了当前关于在验证研究中客观测试替代方法性能的思路。眼部刺激性测试替代方法的验证是一个具体例子,说明了一些重要概念。虽然讨论的重点是旨在取代当前体内毒性试验的替代方法的验证,但这些程序可用于评估用于其他用途的替代方法的性能。