Suppr超能文献

在单一医疗机构中进行的开放式与腹腔镜下尼氏胃底折叠术的疗效比较。

Comparison of outcomes of open versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication performed in a single practice.

作者信息

Eshraghi N, Farahmand M, Soot S J, Rand-Luby L, Deveney C W, Sheppard B C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University and Veteran Administration Medical Center, Portland 97207, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1998 May;175(5):371-4. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00049-X.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We reviewed Nissen fundoplications performed in a single practice from January 1989 to March 1997, encompassing our transition from open to laparoscopic procedures. Because all operations were done by two surgeons in the same two hospitals, the study is well controlled for comparisons.

METHODS

Records of 271 consecutive patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

From 1989 to 1992 all patients underwent open fundoplication (n = 78). Thereafter, with increasing frequency, laparoscopic fundoplication was performed. The laparoscopic group was slightly younger (48 +/- 14 years) than the open group (54 +/- 13 years), but gender distribution and body mass index (BMI) did not differ. Mean operating time for laparoscopic cases was 163 +/- 58 minutes compared with 148 +/- 59 minutes for open cases (NS). Intraoperative complication rate was 8% for both groups. Length of hospitalization was shorter for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery (2.4 days versus 7.2 for open procedures, P <0.05). In follow-up, 82% of the open Nissen group were asymptomatic compared with 84% of the laparoscopic Nissen group. The same proportion of patients required reoperation for dysphagia (3% for each group). Of patients who had the open procedure, 21% had wound complications. None of those treated laparoscopically had long-term morbidity from trocar insertion sites.

CONCLUSION

Equal effectiveness in treating reflux combined with shorter hospitalization and absence of wound complications makes the laparoscopic approach the preferred method for performing fundoplication.

摘要

背景

我们回顾了1989年1月至1997年3月在单一医疗机构进行的nissen胃底折叠术,涵盖了我们从开放手术向腹腔镜手术的转变过程。由于所有手术均由两名外科医生在两家相同的医院完成,因此该研究在比较方面得到了很好的控制。

方法

回顾了连续271例患者的记录。

结果

1989年至1992年,所有患者均接受开放胃底折叠术(n = 78)。此后,腹腔镜胃底折叠术的实施频率逐渐增加。腹腔镜组患者(48±14岁)比开放组患者(54±13岁)略年轻,但性别分布和体重指数(BMI)无差异。腹腔镜手术的平均手术时间为163±58分钟,而开放手术为148±59分钟(无统计学差异)。两组的术中并发症发生率均为8%。接受腹腔镜手术的患者住院时间较短(2.4天,而开放手术为7.2天,P<0.05)。在随访中,开放nissen组82%的患者无症状,而腹腔镜nissen组为84%。两组因吞咽困难需要再次手术的患者比例相同(均为3%)。接受开放手术的患者中有21%发生伤口并发症。接受腹腔镜治疗的患者均未因套管插入部位出现长期并发症。

结论

在治疗反流方面效果相当,同时住院时间较短且无伤口并发症,使得腹腔镜手术成为进行胃底折叠术的首选方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验