Buggy D J, Power C K, Meeke R, O'Callaghan S, Moran C, O'Brien G T
Department of Anaesthesia, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Ireland.
Br J Anaesth. 1998 Feb;80(2):199-203. doi: 10.1093/bja/80.2.199.
We have compared two methods of reducing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia in elderly patients, 6% hetastarch and crystalloid or methoxamine 10 mg i.m., in terms of haemodynamic stability and requirements for additional vasopressors. Sixty-two patients (aged 60-97 yr) undergoing surgical fixation of fractured neck of femur were allocated randomly to receive 6% hetastarch (Hespan) 500 ml followed by Hartmann's solution 500 ml (group HS, n = 32) or a bolus injection of methoxamine 10 mg i.m. (group MX, n = 30), 10 min before induction of spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 2.25-3.0 ml. Arterial pressure was measured non-invasively by an oscillotonometer at 2-min intervals from 0 to 40 min and at 5-min intervals thereafter. Methoxamine 2 mg i.v. was given if systolic arterial pressure (SAP) decreased to < 100 mm Hg. Hypotension was defined as a 25% decrease from baseline SAP or mean arterial pressure (MAP). Patient data, sensory level and blood loss were similar in the two groups. SAP and MAP increased initially from baseline until induction of spinal anaesthesia and then decreased for 30 min in both groups, but remained higher in group MX (P < 0.05). Heart rate (HR) decreased from baseline in group MX (P < 0.05) and was less than in group HS at all times from 2 to 60 min (P < 0.01). The incidence of SAP hypotension (47% vs 75%; P = 0.03, odds ratio (OR) = 3.43) and MAP hypotension (47% vs 67%; P = 0.09, OR = 2.51) was less in group MX than in group HS. Requirements for rescue methoxamine i.v. (27% vs 53%, P = 0.04, OR = 3.11) was less in group MX than in group HS but the dose of rescue methoxamine given (mean 6.3 (95% confidence intervals 3.0-9.6) vs 8.9 (5.6-12.2) mg) and time to onset of hypotension (20.7 (14.5-26.7) vs 17.3 (11.4-23.1) min) were similar in groups MX and HS, respectively. We conclude that methoxamine 10 mg i.m., given 10 min before induction of spinal anaesthesia in normovolaemic elderly patients, reduced subsequent SAP and MAP hypotension, HR and requirements for rescue vasopressor therapy compared with a combination of 6% hetastarch 500 ml and crystalloid 500 ml. The previously reported benefit of such volume administration may not extend to the elderly.
我们比较了老年患者脊髓麻醉期间两种降低低血压的方法,即6%羟乙基淀粉和晶体液,以及静脉注射10mg甲氧明,比较了其血流动力学稳定性和额外血管升压药的需求。62例(年龄60 - 97岁)接受股骨颈骨折手术固定的患者被随机分配,在使用0.5%重比重布比卡因2.25 - 3.0ml进行脊髓麻醉诱导前10分钟,接受500ml 6%羟乙基淀粉(贺斯)随后500ml哈特曼氏溶液(HS组,n = 32),或静脉注射10mg甲氧明(MX组,n = 30)。从0至40分钟每隔2分钟、此后每隔5分钟通过示波血压计无创测量动脉压。如果收缩压(SAP)降至<100mmHg,则静脉注射2mg甲氧明。低血压定义为SAP或平均动脉压(MAP)较基线降低25%。两组患者的数据、感觉平面和失血量相似。两组患者的SAP和MAP在脊髓麻醉诱导前均从基线开始升高,然后在诱导后30分钟内下降,但MX组仍较高(P < 0.05)。MX组心率(HR)较基线下降(P < 0.05),在2至60分钟的所有时间均低于HS组(P < 0.01)。MX组SAP低血压发生率(47% vs 75%;P = 0.03,优势比(OR) = 3.43)和MAP低血压发生率(47% vs 67%;P = 0.09,OR = 2.51)低于HS组。MX组抢救用静脉注射甲氧明的需求(27% vs 53%,P = 0.04,OR = 3.11)低于HS组,但两组抢救用甲氧明的给药剂量(平均6.3(95%置信区间3.0 - 9.6)mg vs 8.9(5.6 - 12.2)mg)和低血压发生时间(20.7(14.5 - 26.7)分钟vs 17.3(11.4 - 23.1)分钟)分别相似。我们得出结论,对于血容量正常的老年患者,在脊髓麻醉诱导前10分钟静脉注射10mg甲氧明,与500ml 6%羟乙基淀粉和500ml晶体液联合使用相比,可降低随后的SAP和MAP低血压、HR以及抢救性血管升压药治疗的需求。此前报道的这种容量给药的益处可能不适用于老年人。