Mock C N, Jurkovich G J, nii-Amon-Kotei D, Arreola-Risa C, Maier R V
Department of Surgery, University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
J Trauma. 1998 May;44(5):804-12; discussion 812-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199805000-00011.
Whereas organized trauma care systems have decreased trauma mortality in the United States, trauma system design has not been well addressed in developing nations. We sought to determine areas in greatest need of improvement in the trauma systems of developing nations.
We compared outcome of all seriously injured (Injury Severity Score > or = 9 or dead), nontransferred, adults managed over 1 year in three cities in nations at different economic levels: (1) Kumasi, Ghana: low income, gross national product (GNP) per capita of $310, no emergency medical service (EMS); (2) Monterrey, Mexico: middle income, GNP $3,900, basic EMS; and (3) Seattle, Washington: high income, GNP $25,000, advanced EMS. Each city had one main trauma hospital, from which hospital data were obtained. Annual budgets (in US$) per bed for these hospitals were as follows: Kumasi, $4,100; Monterrey, $68,000; and Seattle, $606,000. Data on prehospital deaths were obtained from vital statistics registries in Monterrey and Seattle, and by an epidemiologic survey in Kumasi.
Mean age (34 years) and injury mechanisms (79% blunt) were similar in all locations. Mortality declined with increased economic level: Kumasi (63% of all seriously injured persons died), Monterrey (55%), and Seattle (35%). This decline was primarily due to decreases in prehospital deaths. In Kumasi, 51% of all seriously injured persons died in the field; in Monterrey, 40%; and in Seattle, 21%. Mean prehospital time declined progressively: Kumasi (102 +/- 126 minutes) > Monterrey (73 +/- 38 minutes) > Seattle (31 +/- 10 minutes). Percent of trauma patients dying in the emergency room was higher for Monterrey (11%) than for either Kumasi (3%) or Seattle (6%).
The majority of deaths occur in the prehospital setting, indicating the importance of injury prevention in nations at all economic levels. Additional efforts for trauma care improvement in both low-income and middle-income developing nations should focus on prehospital and emergency room care. Improved emergency room care is especially important in middle-income nations which have already established a basic EMS.
尽管有组织的创伤护理系统已降低了美国的创伤死亡率,但发展中国家的创伤系统设计尚未得到很好的解决。我们试图确定发展中国家创伤系统中最需要改进的领域。
我们比较了在不同经济水平国家的三个城市中,所有重伤(损伤严重度评分≥9或已死亡)、未转诊的成年患者在1年以上的治疗结果:(1)加纳库马西:低收入,人均国民生产总值(GNP)310美元,无紧急医疗服务(EMS);(2)墨西哥蒙特雷:中等收入,GNP 3900美元,基本EMS;(3)华盛顿州西雅图:高收入,GNP 25000美元,先进EMS。每个城市都有一家主要的创伤医院,并从该医院获取数据。这些医院每张床位的年度预算(以美元计)如下:库马西4100美元;蒙特雷68000美元;西雅图606000美元。蒙特雷和西雅图的院前死亡数据来自生命统计登记处,库马西的数据通过流行病学调查获得。
所有地区的平均年龄(34岁)和损伤机制(79%为钝性伤)相似。死亡率随着经济水平的提高而下降:库马西(所有重伤患者中有63%死亡)、蒙特雷(55%)和西雅图(35%)。这种下降主要是由于院前死亡人数的减少。在库马西,所有重伤患者中有51%死于现场;在蒙特雷,为40%;在西雅图,为21%。平均院前时间逐渐下降:库马西(102±126分钟)>蒙特雷(73±38分钟)>西雅图(31±10分钟)。蒙特雷创伤患者在急诊室死亡的比例(11%)高于库马西(3%)或西雅图(6%)。
大多数死亡发生在院前阶段,这表明在所有经济水平的国家中预防损伤都很重要。低收入和中等收入发展中国家在改善创伤护理方面的额外努力应集中在院前和急诊室护理上。在已经建立了基本EMS的中等收入国家,改善急诊室护理尤为重要。