Suppr超能文献

可靠的入院格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分对确定创伤后硬膜下血肿是否需要引流的重要性:一项对65例患者的前瞻性研究

Importance of a reliable admission Glasgow Coma Scale score for determining the need for evacuation of posttraumatic subdural hematomas: a prospective study of 65 patients.

作者信息

Servadei F, Nasi M T, Cremonini A M, Giuliani G, Cenni P, Nanni A

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Ospedale Maurizio Bufalini, Cesena, Italy.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1998 May;44(5):868-73. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199805000-00021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients who have an acute subdural hematoma with a thickness of 10 mm or less and with a shift of the midline structures of 5 mm or less often can be treated nonoperatively. We wonder whether the knowledge of the clinical status both in the prehospital determination and on admission to the neurosurgical center can predict the need for evacuation of subdural hematomas as well as the computed tomographic (CT) parameters.

METHODS

From January 1, 1994, to May 31, 1996, 65 comatose patients harboring an acute subdural hematoma of 5 mm or more and not brain dead were admitted to our intensive care unit. Of the 65 patients, 15 patients were initially managed conservatively according to a protocol based on clinical, CT, and intracranial pressure parameters. During the study period, the use of long-lasting paralytic agents has been eliminated to allow detection of clinical deterioration in the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score from the prehospital determination to the hospital admission assessment.

RESULTS

Of the 15 patients initially managed conservatively, two were subsequently operated on because of evolving parenchymal hematomas. When comparing demographic, clinical, and CT parameters between the surgical group of patients and the patients initially conservatively treated, hematoma thickness (mean, 17.1 mm vs. 7.5 mm, p < 0.0001) and shift of the midline structures (mean, 12.8 mm vs. 4.7 mm, p < 0.008) were predictive of the need for surgery. A statistically significant change in the GCS score between prehospital determination and admission assessment was shown in the surgical group of patients (mean GCS score, 8.4 vs. 6.7, p < 0.01), and it was not present (mean GCS score, 7.3 vs. 7.2) in the patients initially conservatively treated. Functional outcomes were present in 23 cases (35.4%); functional outcomes in the initially conservatively treated patients were reached by 10 patients (66.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonoperative management for selected cases of acute subdural hematomas is at least as safe as surgical management. GCS scoring at the scene and in the emergency room combined with early and subsequent CT scanning is crucial when making the decision for nonoperative management. This strategy requires that administration of long-lasting sedatives and paralytic medications be avoided before the patient arrives at the neurosurgical center.

摘要

背景

急性硬膜下血肿厚度在10毫米及以下且中线结构移位在5毫米及以下的患者通常可采用非手术治疗。我们想知道,院前判定及神经外科中心入院时的临床状况信息能否预测硬膜下血肿是否需要进行手术清除以及计算机断层扫描(CT)参数。

方法

1994年1月1日至1996年5月31日,65例患有5毫米及以上急性硬膜下血肿且未脑死亡的昏迷患者被收入我们的重症监护病房。在这65例患者中,15例患者最初根据基于临床、CT及颅内压参数的方案进行保守治疗。在研究期间,停用了长效麻痹剂,以便能检测从院前判定到入院评估期间格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分的临床恶化情况。

结果

在最初接受保守治疗的15例患者中,有2例因实质内血肿进展而随后接受了手术。比较手术组患者与最初接受保守治疗的患者的人口统计学、临床及CT参数发现,血肿厚度(平均17.1毫米对7.5毫米,p<0.0001)及中线结构移位(平均12.8毫米对4.7毫米,p<0.008)可预测是否需要手术。手术组患者院前判定与入院评估之间的GCS评分有统计学显著变化(平均GCS评分8.4对6.7,p<0.01),而最初接受保守治疗的患者则无此变化(平均GCS评分7.3对7.2)。23例(35.4%)患者有功能转归;最初接受保守治疗的患者中有10例(66.7%)实现了功能转归。

结论

对于部分急性硬膜下血肿病例,非手术治疗至少与手术治疗一样安全。在决定是否采用非手术治疗时,现场及急诊室的GCS评分结合早期及后续的CT扫描至关重要。该策略要求在患者到达神经外科中心之前避免使用长效镇静剂和麻痹药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验