• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用韦雷氏针与开放技术进行经皮诊断性腹腔灌洗:一项前瞻性随机试验。

Percutaneous diagnostic peritoneal lavage using a Veress needle versus an open technique: a prospective randomized trial.

作者信息

Saunders C J, Battistella F D, Whetzel T P, Stokes R B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, Health System, Sacramento 95817-2214, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1998 May;44(5):883-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199805000-00023.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199805000-00023
PMID:9603093
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively compare the speed, sensitivity, complications, and technical failures of percutaneous diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) using a Veress needle versus open DPL.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-six blunt trauma patients requiring DPL were prospectively randomized to undergo either open DPL using a standard technique or percutaneous DPL using an 18-gauge Veress needle to penetrate the peritoneal cavity, with the lavage catheter then being inserted over a guide wire.

RESULTS

Mean time to successful placement of the lavage catheter for the percutaneous Veress needle technique was 2.73 minutes versus 7.28 minutes for the open DPL technique (p < 0.001). Sixteen percent of open lavage procedures took more than 11 minutes; the majority (60%) of Veress needle lavage procedures took less than 2 minutes. There were no false-negative findings in either group, and there was one false-positive result in each group. A wound infection after an open DPL was the only complication. Poor return of lavage fluid (<200 mL) accounted for most technical failures; this was more prevalent with the percutaneous method (11.2%) than with the open technique (3.8%) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The percutaneous DPL method using a Veress needle is significantly faster than the open DPL method. The Veress needle lavage was as safe and as sensitive as the open lavage; however, technical failure occurred more frequently with the Veress needle lavage than with the open DPL.

摘要

目的

前瞻性比较使用Veress针进行经皮诊断性腹腔灌洗(DPL)与开放性DPL的速度、敏感性、并发症及技术失败情况。

方法

176例需要进行DPL的钝性创伤患者被前瞻性随机分为两组,一组采用标准技术进行开放性DPL,另一组采用18号Veress针经皮穿刺进入腹腔,然后在导丝引导下插入灌洗导管进行经皮DPL。

结果

经皮Veress针技术成功放置灌洗导管的平均时间为2.73分钟,而开放性DPL技术为7.28分钟(p<0.001)。16%的开放性灌洗操作耗时超过11分钟;大多数(60%)Veress针灌洗操作耗时不到2分钟。两组均无假阴性结果,每组各有1例假阳性结果。开放性DPL术后伤口感染是唯一的并发症。灌洗液体回流量少(<200 mL)是大多数技术失败的原因;经皮方法(11.2%)比开放性技术(3.8%)更常见(p<0.05)。

结论

使用Veress针的经皮DPL方法明显比开放性DPL方法更快。Veress针灌洗与开放性灌洗一样安全且敏感;然而,Veress针灌洗的技术失败比开放性DPL更频繁。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous diagnostic peritoneal lavage using a Veress needle versus an open technique: a prospective randomized trial.使用韦雷氏针与开放技术进行经皮诊断性腹腔灌洗:一项前瞻性随机试验。
J Trauma. 1998 May;44(5):883-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199805000-00023.
2
Percutaneous peritoneal lavage in blunt trauma patients: a safe and accurate diagnostic method.钝性创伤患者的经皮腹膜灌洗:一种安全准确的诊断方法。
J Trauma. 1989 Jun;29(6):801-4; discussion 804-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198906000-00017.
3
Open versus closed diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the evaluation of abdominal trauma.开放性与闭合性诊断性腹腔灌洗在腹部创伤评估中的应用
Am J Surg. 1990 Dec;160(6):594-6; discussion 596-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80752-4.
4
Percutaneous peritoneal lavage using the Veress needle: a preliminary report.使用韦雷氏针经皮腹膜灌洗:初步报告。
J Trauma. 1987 Oct;27(10):1181-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198710000-00015.
5
Open versus closed diagnostic peritoneal lavage: a comparison on safety, rapidity, efficacy.开放式与封闭式诊断性腹腔灌洗:安全性、快速性及有效性的比较
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1998 Aug;43(4):235-8.
6
A prospective, randomized comparison between open and closed peritoneal lavage techniques.开放性与闭合性腹腔灌洗技术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Trauma. 1990 Jul;30(7):880-3. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199007000-00019.
7
Open or closed diagnostic peritoneal lavage for abdominal trauma? A meta-analysis.开放性或闭合性诊断性腹腔灌洗用于腹部创伤?一项荟萃分析。
J Trauma. 2000 Jun;48(6):1091-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200006000-00015.
8
Is closed diagnostic peritoneal lavage contraindicated in patients with previous abdominal surgery?对于曾接受过腹部手术的患者,闭合性诊断性腹腔灌洗是否为禁忌?
Acad Emerg Med. 1997 Apr;4(4):287-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03550.x.
9
Is diagnostic peritoneal lavage for blunt trauma obsolete?诊断性腹腔灌洗用于钝性创伤是否过时了?
Am Surg. 1990 Feb;56(2):96-9.
10
Complementary roles of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and computed tomography in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.诊断性腹腔灌洗与计算机断层扫描在钝性腹部创伤评估中的互补作用。
J Trauma. 2001 Dec;51(6):1128-34; discussion 1134-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200112000-00019.

引用本文的文献

1
Propensity matched analysis of DPA or DPL used within the first hour for severely hypotensive blunt trauma patients.对严重低血压钝性创伤患者在伤后第一小时内使用诊断性腹腔灌洗(DPA)或诊断性腹腔穿刺术(DPL)进行倾向匹配分析。
Surg Open Sci. 2025 Jan 25;24:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.01.005. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Exosomal ROR1 in peritoneal fluid identifies peritoneal disseminated PDAC and is associated with poor survival.腹腔液外泌体 ROR1 可识别腹腔播散性 PDAC,与不良预后相关。
Front Immunol. 2024 May 23;15:1253072. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1253072. eCollection 2024.
3
Percutaneous Peritoneal Lavage for the Rapid Staging of Gastric and Pancreatic Cancer.
经皮腹膜灌洗用于胃癌和胰腺癌的快速分期
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 May;24(5):1174-1179. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5757-3. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
4
A safe quick technique for placement of the first access port for creation of pneumoperitoneum.一种用于创建气腹时放置首个穿刺端口的安全快速技术。
JSLS. 2011 Oct-Dec;15(4):504-8. doi: 10.4293/108680811X13176785204238.
5
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage for diagnosing blunt hollow visceral injury: the accuracy of two different criteria and their combination.
Surg Today. 2005;35(11):935-9. doi: 10.1007/s00595-005-3065-9.
6
Open pneumoperitoneum because of quality assurance.因质量保证进行开放性气腹术。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Oct;19(10):1297-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0111-z.