Vögele C, Jarvis A, Cheeseman K
Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany, FRG.
Ann Behav Med. 1997 Winter;19(1):61-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02883428.
The present study investigated gender-related differences in cardiovascular reactivity and the role of anger inhibition and risk for future hypertension. Tonic blood pressure served as an index of hypertension risk. Twenty-eight female and 26 male college students with high and low normal blood pressure were recruited on the basis of their mean arterial pressure. Continuous measures of heart rate and blood pressure were taken while participants carried out a series of behavioral manoeuvres including mental arithmetic, interpersonal challenge, a frustrating psychomotor test, and the cold pressor test. Participants also completed inventories assessing trait anxiety, trait anger, anger expression, and Type A. The results are in concordance with previous findings and show higher cardiovascular reactivity in men than in women and in subjects at risk for hypertension. Within the male group, a combination of hypertension risk and anger suppression led to the highest reactivity, whereas in female subjects, differences in anger-in had no effect on reactivity. The implications of these results are discussed in light of sex differences in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
本研究调查了心血管反应性方面与性别相关的差异,以及抑制愤怒的作用和未来患高血压的风险。静息血压作为高血压风险的指标。根据平均动脉压招募了28名血压正常偏高和偏低的女大学生以及26名男大学生。在参与者进行一系列行为操作时,持续测量心率和血压,这些操作包括心算、人际挑战、令人沮丧的心理运动测试和冷加压试验。参与者还完成了评估特质焦虑、特质愤怒、愤怒表达和A型人格的量表。结果与先前的研究结果一致,表明男性的心血管反应性高于女性,且高血压风险受试者的反应性更高。在男性组中,高血压风险和愤怒抑制相结合导致了最高的反应性,而在女性受试者中,愤怒抑制方面的差异对反应性没有影响。根据心血管疾病发病率和死亡率方面的性别差异对这些结果的意义进行了讨论。