Suppr超能文献

急诊科婴幼儿尿路感染筛查:哪种检测方法最佳?

Screening for urinary tract infection in infants in the emergency department: which test is best?

作者信息

Shaw K N, McGowan K L, Gorelick M H, Schwartz J S

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1998 Jun;101(6):E1. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.6.e1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of rapid tests and screening strategies for detecting urinary tract infection (UTI) in infants.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study conducted in an urban tertiary care children's hospital emergency department and clinical laboratories of 3873 infants <2 years of age who had a urine culture obtained in the emergency department by urethral catheterization; results of urine dipstick tests for leukocyte esterase or nitrites, enhanced urinalysis (UA) (urine white blood cell count/mm3 plus Gram stain), Gram stain alone, and dipstick plus microscopic UA (white blood cells and bacteria per high-powered field) compared with urine culture results (positive urine results defined as >/=10 colony-forming units per milliliter of urinary tract pathogen) for each sample. Cost comparison of 1) dipstick plus culture of all urine specimens versus 2) cell count +/- Gram stain of urine, culture only those with positive results.

RESULTS

The enhanced UA was most sensitive at detecting UTI (94%; 95% confidence interval: 83,99), but had more false-positive results (16%) than the urine dipstick or Gram stain (3%). The most cost-effective strategy was to perform cultures on all infants and begin presumptive treatment on those whose dipstick had at least moderate (+2) leukocyte esterase or positive nitrite at a cost of $3.70 per child. With this strategy, all infants with UTI were detected. If the enhanced UA was used to screen for when to send the urine for culture, 82% of cultures would be eliminated, but 4% to 6% of infants with UTI would be missed and the cost would be higher ($6.66 per child).

CONCLUSION

No rapid test can detect all infants with UTI. Physicians should send urine for culture from all infants and begin presumptive treatment only on those with a significantly positive dipstick result. The enhanced UA is most sensitive for detecting UTI, but is less specific and more costly, and should be reserved for the neonate for whom a UTI should not be missed at first visit.

摘要

目的

比较用于检测婴儿尿路感染(UTI)的快速检测方法和筛查策略。

方法

在一家城市三级护理儿童医院急诊科和临床实验室对3873名2岁以下婴儿进行横断面研究,这些婴儿在急诊科通过尿道插管获取尿液培养样本;将尿白细胞酯酶或亚硝酸盐试纸检测结果、强化尿液分析(UA)(尿白细胞计数/立方毫米加革兰氏染色)、单独革兰氏染色以及试纸加显微镜下UA(每高倍视野白细胞和细菌数)与每个样本的尿液培养结果进行比较(尿液阳性结果定义为每毫升尿路病原体菌落形成单位≥10)。对以下两种情况进行成本比较:1)所有尿液标本试纸检测加培养与2)尿液细胞计数±革兰氏染色,仅对结果阳性者进行培养。

结果

强化UA检测UTI最敏感(94%;95%置信区间:83,99),但假阳性结果(16%)比尿试纸或革兰氏染色(3%)更多。最具成本效益的策略是对所有婴儿进行培养,并对试纸检测白细胞酯酶至少为中度(+2)或亚硝酸盐阳性的婴儿开始经验性治疗,每个儿童成本为3.70美元。采用该策略,所有UTI婴儿均被检测出。如果使用强化UA来筛查何时送检尿液进行培养,可减少82%的培养,但会漏诊4%至6%的UTI婴儿,且成本更高(每个儿童6.66美元)。

结论

没有一种快速检测方法能检测出所有UTI婴儿。医生应将所有婴儿的尿液送检进行培养,仅对试纸检测结果明显阳性的婴儿开始经验性治疗。强化UA检测UTI最敏感,但特异性较低且成本更高,应仅用于首次就诊时不能漏诊UTI的新生儿。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验