Suppr超能文献

多发性内分泌腺瘤1型胰腺探查中发现的肿瘤累及范围有限:能否通过术前肿瘤定位进行预测?

Limited tumor involvement found at multiple endocrine neoplasia type I pancreatic exploration: can it be predicted by preoperative tumor localization?

作者信息

Skogseid B, Oberg K, Akerström G, Eriksson B, Westlin J E, Janson E T, Eklöf H, Elvin A, Juhlin C, Rastad J

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

World J Surg. 1998 Jul;22(7):673-7; discussion 667-8. doi: 10.1007/s002689900451.

Abstract

Radiologically demonstrable pancreatic endocrine tumors are a frequent requirement for exploration in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I (MEN-I). Such delayed intervention is accompanied by a 30% to 50% incidence of pancreatic endocrine metastases. This study explores biochemical tumor markers and operative findings in relation to preoperative pancreatic radiology in 25 MEN-I patients. They underwent pancreatic surgery with (n = 19) or without (n = 6) radiologic signs of primary tumor and absence of metastases upon conventional examination, including OctreoScan testing (n = 10). Biochemical diagnosis required an increasing elevation of at least two independent pancreatic tumor markers. Tumor diameters averaged 1.1 cm (0-5 cm) and 0.9 cm (0.2-1.5 cm) in the patients with and without positive preoperative radiology, respectively. These investigations never displayed more than one of the consistently multiple tumors, and the results were falsely positive in 26%. Preoperatively unidentified regional or hepatic metastases were found at surgical exploration in 26% of patients with radiologic localization and in none of the others. Limited pancreatic tumor involvement necessitated intraoperative absence of metastases and pancreatic lesions </= 1 cm in diameter on palpation, intraoperative ultrasonography, and microscopy. It occurred in 37% and 50% of the patients with and without radiologic tumor localization, respectively. The number of positive tumor markers was similar for patients with limited and major disease (2.3 vs. 2.7), whereas four or more such markers were found in all those with malignancies. The mean marker level was higher in patients with radiologically demonstrable tumors and lower in those with limited disease, but with a substantial overlap. OctreoScan testing was negative in all cases with limited disease and was the single most sensitive method (75%) in the others. Limited pancreatic disease could not be identified preoperatively, and the present means of biochemical pancreatic tumor identification invariably involved the presence of at least one lesion >/= 7 mm in diameter. Conventional pancreatic imaging is insensitive and nonspecific for recognizing even substantial pancreatic tumors associated with MEN-I.

摘要

对于多发性内分泌腺瘤1型(MEN - I)患者,经放射学证实的胰腺内分泌肿瘤常常需要进行探查。这种延迟干预伴随着30%至50%的胰腺内分泌转移发生率。本研究探讨了25例MEN - I患者中与术前胰腺放射学相关的生化肿瘤标志物及手术发现。他们接受了胰腺手术,其中19例有原发肿瘤的放射学征象且常规检查(包括奥曲肽扫描检测,共10例)未发现转移,6例无原发肿瘤的放射学征象。生化诊断需要至少两种独立的胰腺肿瘤标志物持续升高。术前有放射学阳性表现的患者肿瘤直径平均为1.1厘米(0 - 5厘米),术前无放射学阳性表现的患者肿瘤直径平均为0.9厘米(0.2 - 1.5厘米)。这些检查从未显示出多个始终存在的肿瘤中的一个以上,结果假阳性率为26%。在有放射学定位的患者中,26%在手术探查时发现术前未发现 的区域或肝转移,其他患者均未发现。胰腺肿瘤累及范围有限要求术中未发现转移且触诊、术中超声检查及显微镜检查显示胰腺病变直径≤1厘米。分别在有和无放射学肿瘤定位的患者中,这一情况发生率为37%和50%。疾病局限和严重的患者阳性肿瘤标志物数量相似(分别为2.3个和2.7个),而所有恶性肿瘤患者均发现有四个或更多此类标志物。有放射学可证实肿瘤的患者标志物平均水平较高,疾病局限的患者标志物平均水平较低,但有大量重叠。所有疾病局限的病例奥曲肽扫描检测均为阴性,在其他病例中奥曲肽扫描检测是最敏感的单一方法(75%)。术前无法识别胰腺疾病局限情况,目前生化方法识别胰腺肿瘤总是需要存在至少一个直径≥7毫米的病变。传统胰腺成像对于识别与MEN - I相关的甚至较大的胰腺肿瘤也不敏感且缺乏特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验