Suppr超能文献

单剂量菊粉快速测定肾小球滤过率:估计分析的比较

Rapid determination of glomerular filtration rate by single-bolus inulin: a comparison of estimation analyses.

作者信息

Sturgeon C, Sam A D, Law W R

机构信息

Surgery and Research Services, West Side Veterans Affairs Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998 Jun;84(6):2154-62. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.6.2154.

Abstract

Rapid measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by an inulin single-bolus technique would be useful, but its accuracy has been questioned. We hypothesized that reported inaccuracies reflect the use of inappropriate mathematical models. GFR was measured in 14 intact and 5 unilaterally nephrectomized conscious male Sprague-Dawley rats (mean weight 368 +/- 12 g) by both single-bolus (25 mg/kg) and constant-infusion techniques (0.693 mg . kg-1 . min-1). The temporal decline in plasma inulin concentration was analyzed through biexponential curve fitting, which accounted for renal inulin loss before complete vascular and interstitial mixing. We compared our mathematical model based on empirical rationale with those of other investigators whose studies suggest inaccuracy of single-bolus methods. Our mathematical model yielded GFR values by single bolus that agreed with those obtained by constant infusion [slope = 0.94 +/- 0.16 (SE); y intercept = 0.23 +/- 0.64; r = 0.82]. In comparison to the data obtained by constant inulin infusion, this method yielded a very small bias of -0.0041 +/- 0.19 ml/min. Two previously reported models yielded unsatisfactory values (slope = 1. 46 +/- 0.34, y intercept = 0.47 +/- 1.5, r = 0.72; and slope = 0.17 +/- 1.26, y intercept = 17.15 +/- 5.14, r = 0.03). The biases obtained by using these methods were -2.21 +/- 0.42 and -13.90 +/- 1. 44 ml/min, respectively. The data indicate that when appropriate mathematical models are used, inulin clearance after single-bolus delivery can be used to measure GFR equivalent to that obtained by constant infusion of inulin. Attempts to use methods of analysis for simplicity or expediency can result in unacceptable measurements relative to the clinical range of values seen.

摘要

采用菊粉单次推注技术快速测量肾小球滤过率(GFR)会很有用,但该方法的准确性一直受到质疑。我们推测,所报道的测量不准确反映了使用了不恰当的数学模型。通过单次推注(25 mg/kg)和持续输注技术(0.693 mg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹),对14只完整的和5只单侧肾切除的清醒雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠(平均体重368±12 g)进行了GFR测量。通过双指数曲线拟合分析血浆菊粉浓度随时间的下降情况,该方法考虑了在血管和间质完全混合之前肾脏对菊粉的清除。我们将基于经验原理的数学模型与其他研究者的模型进行了比较,他们的研究表明单次推注法存在测量不准确的情况。我们的数学模型通过单次推注得出的GFR值与持续输注法得到的值一致[斜率 = 0.94±0.16(标准误);y轴截距 = 0.23±0.64;r = 0.82]。与菊粉持续输注获得的数据相比,该方法产生的偏差非常小,为 -0.0041±0.19 ml/min。之前报道的两个模型得出的值并不理想(斜率 = 1.46±0.34,y轴截距 = 0.47±1.5,r = 0.72;以及斜率 = 0.17±1.26,y轴截距 = 17.15±5.14,r = 0.03)。使用这些方法获得的偏差分别为 -2.21±0.42和 -13.90±1.44 ml/min。数据表明,当使用恰当的数学模型时,单次推注给药后的菊粉清除率可用于测量与菊粉持续输注相当的GFR。为了简便或省事而尝试使用分析方法,可能会导致相对于临床所见值范围而言不可接受的测量结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验