Bell R C, Dudgeon P, McGorry P D, Jackson H J
Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1998 May;97(5):334-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1998.tb10012.x.
This study aimed to determine the dimensionality of concepts of schizophrenia using 11 different diagnostic systems, and then to identify the nature of these dimensions by their relationship to a range of signs and symptoms. The sample consisted of 479 patients admitted with a first episode of functional psychosis. The underlying structure of the 11 diagnostic systems was best represented by an oblique 3-factor solution. Whereas the second and third factors could be meaningfully interpreted by their correlations with signs and symptoms, the first factor, anchored by 'modern' nosologies such as DSM-III-R, was more clearly specified by what it is not (the absence of affective symptoms) rather than by what it is (the presence of characteristic psychotic symptoms). A logistic regression of DSM-III-R diagnosis on to separate diagnostic components supports the contention that duration of illness and affective exclusion criteria discriminate the presence of DSM-III-R schizophrenia much better than the three characteristic psychotic symptom groupings.
本研究旨在使用11种不同的诊断系统确定精神分裂症概念的维度,然后通过其与一系列体征和症状的关系来确定这些维度的性质。样本包括479例首次发作功能性精神病的住院患者。11种诊断系统的潜在结构最好用一个斜交三因素解来表示。虽然第二和第三个因素可以通过它们与体征和症状的相关性得到有意义的解释,但以DSM-III-R等“现代”分类法为锚定的第一个因素,更明确的是由其不是什么(不存在情感症状)来界定,而非由其是什么(存在特征性精神病性症状)来界定。将DSM-III-R诊断对单独的诊断成分进行逻辑回归,支持了这样的观点,即病程和情感排除标准比三种特征性精神病性症状分组能更好地区分DSM-III-R精神分裂症的存在。