Foley Sharon R, Browne Stephen, Clarke Mary, Kinsella Anthony, Larkin Conall, O'Callaghan Eadbhard
DETECT, 1 Marine Terrace, Dun Laoghaire, Dublin, Ireland.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;42(8):606-10. doi: 10.1007/s00127-007-0217-9. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
Violence in first episode psychosis poses significant challenges for mental health staff and patients' families. Violence has been shown to be related to psychopathology. Duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) has been shown to influence psychopathology at presentation in first-episode psychosis, but little is known about the direct relationship between violence at presentation and DUP. We therefore sought to examine the relationship between these two variables.
Patients were all individuals aged between 16 and 65 years, with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of psychotic illness, taking part in a First Episode study. We used the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-I), Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), Beiser Scale and the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) to evaluate diagnosis, psychopathology, DUP and violent behaviour respectively. Data for each case were retrospectively examined for violence, for the week prior to and week following first contact with psychiatric services, blind to diagnosis, DUP and psychopathology scores.
We assessed 157 patients. About 46 patients (29%) were violent. Violence rates did not differ across diagnostic groups, while DUP varied significantly across diagnostic groups (P = 0.001). Violence was not associated with DUP across all psychoses (P = 0.41). In the schizophrenia subgroup (n = 94), thirty individuals (32%) were violent. In a logistic regression, logDUP was not associated with violence (P = 0.11). Violence was predicted by involuntary admission status (P = 0.04) and global positive symptoms (P = 0.03). DUP was associated weakly with negative symptoms (P = 0.01) but not associated with positive or general psychopathology. Neither pre nor post-contact violence was associated (P = 0.79 and P = 0.09 respectively) with DUP.
Contrary to a recent study, we did not find an association between violence at presentation and DUP. The relationships between violence, DUP and psychopathology are complex and may be compounded by potential difficulties inherent in the PANSS.
Programs to reduce DUP may not impact on rates of violence at presentation in First Episode Psychosis (FEP).
首发精神病患者的暴力行为给精神卫生工作人员和患者家属带来了重大挑战。暴力行为已被证明与精神病理学有关。未治疗精神病持续时间(DUP)已被证明会影响首发精神病患者就诊时的精神病理学,但对于就诊时的暴力行为与DUP之间的直接关系知之甚少。因此,我们试图研究这两个变量之间的关系。
患者均为年龄在16至65岁之间、符合DSM-III-R精神病诊断标准且参与首发研究的个体。我们分别使用结构化临床访谈(SCID-I)、阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)、贝泽量表和改良外显攻击量表(MOAS)来评估诊断、精神病理学、DUP和暴力行为。对每个病例的数据进行回顾性检查,以确定在首次接触精神科服务之前和之后一周的暴力行为情况,对诊断、DUP和精神病理学评分进行盲法评估。
我们评估了157名患者。约46名患者(29%)存在暴力行为。各诊断组的暴力发生率无差异,而DUP在各诊断组之间有显著差异(P = 0.001)。在所有精神病患者中,暴力行为与DUP无关(P = 0.41)。在精神分裂症亚组(n = 94)中,30名个体(32%)存在暴力行为。在逻辑回归分析中,logDUP与暴力行为无关(P = 0.11)。暴力行为可由非自愿入院状态(P = 0.04)和总体阳性症状(P = 0.03)预测。DUP与阴性症状有较弱关联(P = 0.01),但与阳性或总体精神病理学无关。接触前和接触后的暴力行为均与DUP无关(分别为P = 0.79和P = 0.09)。
与最近的一项研究相反,我们没有发现就诊时的暴力行为与DUP之间存在关联。暴力行为、DUP和精神病理学之间的关系很复杂,可能因PANSS固有的潜在困难而更加复杂。
缩短DUP的项目可能不会影响首发精神病(FEP)患者就诊时的暴力发生率。