• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰肺移植项目的技术评估。

Technology assessment of the Dutch Lung Transplantation Program.

作者信息

van Enckevort P J, TenVergert E M, Bonsel G J, Geertsma A, van der Bij W, de Boer W J, Koopmanschap M A, Al M J, Rutten F F

机构信息

University Hospital Groningen.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Spring;14(2):344-56. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300012307.

DOI:10.1017/s0266462300012307
PMID:9611908
Abstract

The costs, effects, and cost-effectiveness of the Dutch Lung Transplantation program were assessed. The results show that lung transplantation is a very costly intervention that improves survival and quality of life. Costs per life-year and per QALY gained were, respectively, US $90,000 and US $71,000.

摘要

对荷兰肺移植项目的成本、效果及成本效益进行了评估。结果显示,肺移植是一项成本高昂的干预措施,但能提高生存率和生活质量。每获得一个生命年和一个质量调整生命年的成本分别为9万美元和7.1万美元。

相似文献

1
Technology assessment of the Dutch Lung Transplantation Program.荷兰肺移植项目的技术评估。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Spring;14(2):344-56. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300012307.
2
Cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation in The Netherlands: a scenario analysis.荷兰肺移植的成本效益:一项情景分析。
Chest. 1998 Jan;113(1):124-30. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.1.124.
3
[The evaluation of the lung transplantation program at Groningen: survival rate, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness].[格罗宁根肺移植项目评估:生存率、生活质量和成本效益]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Apr 25;142(17):957-62.
4
The cost effectiveness of lung transplantation compared with that of heart and liver transplantation in the Netherlands.荷兰肺移植与心脏和肝移植相比的成本效益。
Transpl Int. 2003 Feb;16(2):123-7. doi: 10.1007/s00147-002-0508-8. Epub 2003 Jan 14.
5
A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility study of lung transplantation.肺移植的成本效益与成本效用研究
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Sep;24(9):1275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2004.10.012.
6
Lung transplantation in The Netherlands: first results of the medical technology assessment.
Transplant Proc. 1995 Dec;27(6):3486-7.
7
An economic evaluation of lung transplantation.肺移植的经济学评估。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Mar;123(3):411-8; discussion 418-20. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.120342.
8
Lifetime costs of lung transplantation: estimation of incremental costs.肺移植的终身成本:增量成本估算
Health Econ. 1997 Sep-Oct;6(5):479-89. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199709)6:5<479::aid-hec287>3.0.co;2-v.
9
Cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation and its evolution: the Portuguese case.肺移植的成本效益及其演变:葡萄牙的情况。
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Sep;15(7):767-72. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0522-z. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
10
The cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation. A pilot study. University of Washington Medical Center Lung Transplant Study Group.肺移植的成本效益:一项试点研究。华盛顿大学医学中心肺移植研究小组
Chest. 1995 Dec;108(6):1594-601. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.6.1594.

引用本文的文献

1
Costs of End-of-Life Hospitalizations in the United States for People With Pulmonary Diseases.美国肺部疾病患者临终住院的费用。
Chest. 2024 Jul;166(1):146-156. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.01.022. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
2
Incorporating ex-vivo lung perfusion into the UK adult lung transplant service: an economic evaluation and decision analytic model.将体外肺灌注纳入英国成人肺移植服务:一项经济评估与决策分析模型
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 22;19(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4154-6.
3
A computer simulation model of the cost-effectiveness of routine Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization among lung and heart-lung transplant recipients.
一项关于肺移植和心肺移植受者中常规金黄色葡萄球菌筛查及去定植的成本效益的计算机模拟模型。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Jun;33(6):1053-61. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-2046-y. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
4
Technology and outcomes assessment in lung transplantation.肺移植中的技术与结果评估
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009 Jan 15;6(1):128-36. doi: 10.1513/pats.200809-102GO.
5
The "health benefit basket" in the Netherlands.荷兰的“健康福利篮子”。
Eur J Health Econ. 2005 Dec;Suppl(Suppl 1):53-7. doi: 10.1007/s10198-005-0319-9.
6
Cost effectiveness of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in liver transplant patients.肝移植患者消化道选择性去污的成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(5 Pt 1):523-30. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119050-00007.