Christgau M, Bader N, Schmalz G, Hiller K A, Wenzel A
Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Regensburg, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 1997 Sep;1(3):109-18. doi: 10.1007/s007840050021.
The goal of this investigation was to evaluate the effect of postoperative exposure of two different bioresorbable membranes on the guided tissue regeneration (GTR) healing results compared to nonexposed sites. In each of 25 patients one pair of contralateral intrabony lesions was treated either with polylactic acid (PLA) or polyglactin 910 (PG-910) membranes. Postoperative exposure occurred in 9 PLA and 13 PG-910 sites. Standardized clinical [papillary bleeding index (PBI), gingival recession (REC), probing pocket depth (PPD), probing attachment level (PAL)] and radiographic examinations (digital subtraction radiography) were performed immediately before (baseline) and 6 and 12 months postoperatively (p.o.). Subgingival bacterial samples from surgical sites were evaluated by culture at baseline, 6 weeks, and 6 and 12 months p.o. Six months after surgery the changes (delta) of REC were significantly (P < or = 0.05) greater in exposed than in nonexposed sites, independently of the membrane material (median): exposed sites, delta REC = -1 mm; nonexposed sites, delta REC = 0.0 mm. However, 12 months p.o. no significant differences were found due to a decrease in the initial recessions in exposed sites. Although a higher percentage of exposed than nonexposed sites harbored periodontal pathogens 6 weeks p.o. at the gingiva-faced membrane surface, membrane exposure did not have a significant negative effect on delta PPD, delta PAL, or radiographic bone density changes 6 and 12 months p.o. Both membranes showed significant gains in PAL and bone density in both exposed and nonexposed sites. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that with consistent infection control the postoperative exposure of PLA and PG-910 membranes has no significant negative effect on the regeneration outcome, although higher initial gingival recessions must be expected than in the nonexposed sites. However, in exposed sites plaque and infection control were clearly impeded by the rough, exposed membrane surfaces and by the initially negative gingival morphology.
本研究的目的是评估两种不同生物可吸收膜术后暴露对引导组织再生(GTR)愈合结果的影响,并与未暴露部位进行比较。在25例患者中,每例患者的一对对侧骨内病变分别用聚乳酸(PLA)或聚乙醇酸910(PG - 910)膜治疗。术后暴露发生在9个PLA膜部位和13个PG - 910膜部位。在术前(基线)、术后6个月和12个月进行标准化临床检查[乳头出血指数(PBI)、牙龈退缩(REC)、探诊袋深度(PPD)、探诊附着水平(PAL)]和影像学检查(数字减影放射成像)。在基线、术后6周、术后6个月和12个月对手术部位的龈下细菌样本进行培养评估。术后6个月,无论使用何种膜材料(中位数),暴露部位的REC变化(差值)均显著大于未暴露部位(P≤0.05):暴露部位,ΔREC = -1 mm;未暴露部位,ΔREC = 0.0 mm。然而,术后12个月时,由于暴露部位初始退缩的减少,未发现显著差异。虽然术后6周时,暴露部位比未暴露部位有更高比例的龈面膜表面存在牙周病原体,但膜暴露对术后6个月和12个月时的ΔPPD、ΔPAL或影像学骨密度变化没有显著负面影响。两种膜在暴露和未暴露部位的PAL和骨密度均有显著增加。总之,本研究表明,在一致的感染控制下,PLA和PG - 910膜的术后暴露对再生结果没有显著负面影响,尽管预期暴露部位的初始牙龈退缩会高于未暴露部位。然而,在暴露部位,粗糙的暴露膜表面和初始的负向牙龈形态明显阻碍了菌斑和感染控制。