Fabbri L, Caramori G, Beghe B, Papi A, Ciaccia A
Dipartmento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Universita di Ferrara, Italy.
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 1998 Mar;4(2):76-84. doi: 10.1097/00063198-199803000-00004.
Although chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has a public health importance similar to asthma, it has received less attention. The first guideline on the management of COPD was released in 1987 by the American Thoracic Society. In 1992 the Canadian Thoracic Society released its guidelines. In 1995 the European Respiratory Society and the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand released their guidelines and the American Thoracic Society updated and expand its COPD guidelines. All these documents were followed in 1997 by the guidelines developed by the British Thoracic Society. These COPD guidelines show many similarities but also have some interesting differences. The aim of this paper is to review these similarities and discrepancies. Like all guidelines, COPD guidelines suffer from the limited amount of evidence-based medicine supporting them, a limitation that, however, provides a strong stimulus for further research.
尽管慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)在公共卫生方面的重要性与哮喘相当,但它受到的关注较少。美国胸科学会于1987年发布了首份COPD管理指南。1992年,加拿大胸科学会发布了其指南。1995年,欧洲呼吸学会以及澳大利亚和新西兰胸科学会发布了它们的指南,美国胸科学会则更新并扩充了其COPD指南。1997年,英国胸科学会制定的指南紧随其后。这些COPD指南显示出许多相似之处,但也存在一些有趣的差异。本文旨在综述这些相似点和差异。与所有指南一样,COPD指南也存在循证医学证据有限的问题,然而,这一局限性为进一步研究提供了强大动力。