Bennett H G, Hay J, Kirkness C M, Seal D V, Devonshire P
Tennent Institute of Ophthalmology, University of Glasgow.
Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Feb;82(2):137-45. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.2.137.
To determine the quantitative relation between the major risk factors for microbial keratitis of previous ocular surface disease and contact lens wear and central and peripheral infiltration, often associated with ulceration, in order to establish a rational chemotherapeutic management algorithm.
Data from 55 patients were collected over a 10 month period. All cases of presumed microbial keratitis where corneal scrapes had been subjected to microbiological examination were included. Risk factor data and laboratory outcome were recorded. Antimicrobial regimens used to treat each patient were documented.
57 episodes of presumed microbial keratitis were identified from 55 patients, 24 male and 31 female. There were 30 central infiltrates and 27 peripheral infiltrates of which 28 were culture positive (73% of central infiltrates, 22% of peripheral infiltrates). 26 patients had worn contact lenses of whom 12 had culture positive scrapes (9/14 for central infiltrates, 3/12 for peripheral infiltrates). 31 patients had an ocular surface disease of whom five previous herpes simplex virus keratitis patients developed secondary bacterial infection. Anterior chamber activity and an infiltrate size > or = 4 mm2 were more common with culture positive central infiltrates than peripheral infiltrates (chi 2 test = 11.98, p < 0.001).
Predisposing factors for "presumed" microbial keratitis, either central or peripheral, were: ocular surface disease (26/57 = 45.6%), contact lens wear (26/57 = 45.6%), and previous trauma (5/57 = 8.8%). Larger ulceration (> or = 4 mm2) with inflammation was more often associated with positive culture results for central infiltration. None of these four variables (contact lens wear, ocular surface disease, ulcer size, anterior chamber activity) were of intrinsic value in predicting if a peripheral infiltrate would yield identifiable micro-organisms. Successful management of presumed microbial keratitis is aided by a logical approach to therapy, with the use of a defined algorithm of first and second line broad spectrum antimicrobials, for application at each stage of the investigative and treatment process considering central and peripheral infiltration separately.
确定既往眼表疾病和隐形眼镜佩戴这两个微生物性角膜炎主要危险因素与常伴有溃疡形成的中央及周边浸润之间的定量关系,以建立合理的化学治疗管理方案。
在10个月期间收集了55例患者的数据。纳入所有进行过角膜刮片微生物学检查的疑似微生物性角膜炎病例。记录危险因素数据和实验室结果。记录用于治疗每位患者的抗菌方案。
从55例患者中识别出57次疑似微生物性角膜炎发作,其中男性24例,女性31例。有30次中央浸润和27次周边浸润,其中28次培养阳性(中央浸润的73%,周边浸润的22%)。26例患者佩戴过隐形眼镜,其中12例角膜刮片培养阳性(中央浸润14例中的9例,周边浸润12例中的3例)。31例患者有眼表疾病,其中5例既往单纯疱疹病毒性角膜炎患者发生了继发性细菌感染。与周边浸润相比,培养阳性的中央浸润更常伴有前房炎症和浸润面积≥4mm²(χ²检验=11.98,p<0.001)。
“疑似”微生物性角膜炎(中央或周边)的易感因素为:眼表疾病(26/57 = 45.6%)、隐形眼镜佩戴(26/57 = 45.6%)和既往外伤(5/57 = 8.8%)。伴有炎症的较大溃疡(≥4mm²)更常与中央浸润的培养阳性结果相关。这四个变量(隐形眼镜佩戴、眼表疾病、溃疡大小、前房炎症)在预测周边浸润是否会培养出可识别的微生物方面均无内在价值。对疑似微生物性角膜炎的成功管理需要采用合理的治疗方法,使用明确的一线和二线广谱抗菌药物方案,在调查和治疗过程的每个阶段分别考虑中央和周边浸润情况进行应用。