• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医疗中的复杂健康问题:我们是否需要一种用于改善诊疗及患者参与度的工具?患者视角调查问卷(PPS)的理论基础、开发及用户评估

Complex health problems in general practice: do we need an instrument for consultation improvement and patient involvement? Theoretical foundation, development and user evaluation of the Patient Perspective Survey (PPS).

作者信息

Laerum E, Steine S, Finset A, Lundevall S

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Blindern, Norway.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 1998 Apr;15(2):172-81. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.2.172.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/15.2.172
PMID:9613487
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Many patients in general practice present with complex health problems. It is argued that the GP who is in a prime position to counsel patients with such problems, will, however, often perceive a lack of tools to manage them. The aim of the present study was to develop a novel instrument in terms of a patient-administered questionnaire, the Patient Perspective Survey (PPS), designed to enhance the quality of clinical communication in the consultation. It is based on a biopsychosocial patient perspective, patient centredness, patient resources, involvement and coping, and quality of life orientation.

METHODS

Development of the PPS has included comprehensive literature research, discussions and advice, during several phases, from groups of GPs, patients, broad panels of experts and testing in pilot studies. After many revisions, a 102-item version, consisting of a main somatic, mental and social domain axis, was evaluated by GPs and patients in 213 consultations.

RESULTS

The basic idea, theoretical elements and purpose of the PPS appeared in general to be well accepted. Seventy-five to eighty-five per cent of the patients found the questions relevant and easy to understand and there were high positive scorings regarding influence on the doctor-patient relationship, communication, resource and coping aspects, occurrence of new information and general satisfaction with the consultation. Similar scorings were obtained from the GPs' evaluation. Both parties agreed that there is a need for a shorter and more specific PPS version, and that the resource and coping dimension should be even more extended.

CONCLUSIONS

We consider it well documented that there is a need for this new instrument to deal with complex health problems in general practice, and that it has promising potentials for consultation improvement.

摘要

背景与目的

许多普通科患者存在复杂的健康问题。有人认为,处于为这类患者提供咨询最佳位置的全科医生,往往会觉得缺乏管理这些问题的工具。本研究的目的是开发一种新型工具,即患者自填式问卷——患者视角调查(PPS),旨在提高会诊中临床沟通的质量。它基于生物心理社会患者视角、以患者为中心、患者资源、参与和应对以及生活质量导向。

方法

PPS的开发包括在几个阶段进行全面的文献研究、讨论和咨询,参与的有全科医生小组、患者、广泛的专家小组,并在试点研究中进行测试。经过多次修订,一个由102个项目组成的版本,包括一个主要的躯体、心理和社会领域轴,在213次会诊中由全科医生和患者进行了评估。

结果

PPS的基本理念、理论要素和目的总体上似乎得到了很好的接受。75%至85%的患者认为这些问题相关且易于理解,在对医患关系、沟通、资源和应对方面、新信息的出现以及对会诊的总体满意度方面有很高的积极评分。全科医生的评估也得到了类似的评分。双方都认为需要一个更简短、更具体的PPS版本,并且资源和应对维度应该进一步扩展。

结论

我们认为有充分的证据表明,在普通科处理复杂健康问题需要这种新工具,并且它在改善会诊方面有很大的潜力。

相似文献

1
Complex health problems in general practice: do we need an instrument for consultation improvement and patient involvement? Theoretical foundation, development and user evaluation of the Patient Perspective Survey (PPS).全科医疗中的复杂健康问题:我们是否需要一种用于改善诊疗及患者参与度的工具?患者视角调查问卷(PPS)的理论基础、开发及用户评估
Fam Pract. 1998 Apr;15(2):172-81. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.2.172.
2
The final version of the Patient Perspective Survey (PPS): a new tool to improve consultation outcome and patient participation in general practice patients with complex health problems. Doctors' and patients' evaluation and guidelines for clinical use.患者视角调查问卷(PPS)最终版:一种改善会诊结果及提高患有复杂健康问题的全科医疗患者参与度的新工具。医生及患者评估与临床使用指南。
Fam Pract. 2002 Jun;19(3):264-71. doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.3.264.
3
The Patient Perspective Survey (PPS): a new tool to improve consultation outcome and patient involvement in general practice patients with complex health problems. Psychometric testing and development of a final version.
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Feb;52(2):201-7. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00090-9.
4
The patient perspective survey. Can consultations for complex health problems be enhanced?
Aust Fam Physician. 2001 Jun;30(6):616-9.
5
A questionnaire study of GPs' and patients' beliefs about the different components of patient centredness.一项关于全科医生和患者对以患者为中心的不同组成部分的看法的问卷调查研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Jul;47(3):223-7. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(01)00200-2.
6
Complexity of GPs' explanations about mental health problems: development, reliability, and validity of a measure.全科医生对心理健康问题解释的复杂性:一项测量方法的开发、信度和效度
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Jun;58(551):403-8, 410. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X299281.
7
How well do patient and general practitioner agree about the content of consultations?患者与全科医生对诊疗内容的意见一致性如何?
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1999 Sep;17(3):149-52. doi: 10.1080/028134399750002557.
8
Measuring quality in general practice. Pilot study of a needs, process and outcome measure.衡量全科医疗质量。需求、过程及结果测量的试点研究。
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 1997 Feb(75):i-xii, 1-32.
9
What do patients bring up in consultations? An observational study in general practice.患者在会诊中会提及哪些问题?一项全科医疗的观察性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;33(3):206-11. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1067518. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
10
Is three a crowd? Impact of the presence of a medical student in the general practice consultation.三人成众?医学生出现在全科医疗会诊中的影响。
Med Educ. 2016 Feb;50(2):225-35. doi: 10.1111/medu.12935.

引用本文的文献

1
Is perceived patient involvement in mental health care associated with satisfaction and empowerment?患者感知到的参与精神卫生保健与满意度和赋权有关吗?
Health Expect. 2015 Aug;18(4):516-26. doi: 10.1111/hex.12052. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
2
Measuring patients' perceptions of patient-centered care: a systematic review of tools for family medicine.测量患者对以患者为中心的医疗服务的感知:家庭医学工具的系统评价。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):155-64. doi: 10.1370/afm.1226.
3
Towards a global definition of patient centred care.迈向以患者为中心的医疗的全球定义。
BMJ. 2001 Feb 24;322(7284):444-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.444.