Päivänsalo M J, Suramo I, Merikanto J, Lindholm E L
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Oulu, FIN-90220 Oulu, Finland.
Eur J Ultrasound. 1998 Apr;7(2):145-51. doi: 10.1016/s0929-8266(98)00017-2.
We evaluated interobserver and interequipment variability in common carotid and vertebral flow measurements, using seven female members of nursing staff as subjects, four different ultrasound machines and three different radiologists as operators.
The flow of the common carotid and vertebral arteries in each subject was examined at 0, 10, 20 and 30 min after lying down in a supine position. Peak velocity, end-diastolic velocity, mean velocity, systolic acceleration, cross-sectional area of the vessel, flow volume/min, resistance index and Doppler angle were measured.
A large proportion of the variance of peak velocity, cross-sectional area of the vessel and flow volume was patient-related. Significantly different values of end-diastolic velocity, mean velocity, resistance index, Doppler angle and systolic acceleration were obtained with different equipment. Significantly different values of systolic acceleration, vertebral peak velocity, common carotid artery flow and Doppler angle were obtained by different operators. However, part of the variability may be physiological due to the study protocol.
The use of the same operator and equipment is recommended in follow-up examinations.
我们以七名女性护理人员为研究对象,使用四台不同的超声机器,并由三名不同的放射科医生作为操作人员,评估颈总动脉和椎动脉血流测量中的观察者间及设备间差异。
让每位受试者仰卧位躺下后,在0、10、20和30分钟时检查其颈总动脉和椎动脉的血流。测量峰值流速、舒张末期流速、平均流速、收缩期加速度、血管横截面积、每分钟血流量、阻力指数和多普勒角度。
峰值流速、血管横截面积和血流量的很大一部分变异与患者相关。不同设备测得的舒张末期流速、平均流速、阻力指数、多普勒角度和收缩期加速度值存在显著差异。不同操作人员测得的收缩期加速度、椎动脉峰值流速、颈总动脉血流量和多普勒角度值存在显著差异。然而,由于研究方案的原因,部分变异性可能是生理性的。
建议在后续检查中使用同一操作人员和设备。