Characterization of excitation-contraction coupling in conscious dogs with pacing-induced heart failure.

OBJECTIVE

In isolated cardiac preparations of non-failing hearts from different species, including man, there is a positive force-frequency relation which is reversed into a negative relation in preparation from failing hearts. Whether or not such relations between ventricular function and heart rate hold true in the in situ heart is not clear at present. Mechanical restitution and postextrasystolic potentiation might serve as alternative measures of excitation-contraction coupling.

METHODS

Eleven dogs were instrumented with a left ventricular micromanometer, ultrasonic crystals for the measurement of regional wall thickness, two hydraulic occluders around the descending aorta and the inferior caval vein, and left atrial and ventricular pacing leads with a subcutaneous pacemaker. Left ventricular dP/dtmax, as an isovolumic phase index, and systolic wall thickening, as an ejection phase index, were plotted versus heart rate, and heart rate was increased by left atrial pacing from rest to 200 min-1 in increments of 25 min-1. In a subset of dogs, left ventricular filling was controlled and the frequency range expanded by the bradycardic agent UL-FS 49. Measurements were performed in the presence and absence of autonomic blockade (hexamethonium, atropine). Mechanical restitution and postextrasystolic potentiation were determined as normalized dP/dtmax and systolic wall thickening, respectively, of the extra- and postextrasystolic beat versus defined variations of the extrasystolic time interval (250-550 ms). Following control studies, heart failure was induced by rapid left ventricular pacing at 250 min-1 for 20 days +/- 6 (SD) and measurements repeated. Isolated left ventricular trabeculae from non-failing and failing hearts were studied during stimulation at 0.2-4 Hz.

RESULTS

Only with filling control and in the absence of autonomic blockade, was there a slightly positive relation between dP/dtmax and heart rate in the control state. Otherwise, the relation of dP/dtmax to heart rate was flat both in the control state and in heart failure. The relation between systolic wall thickening and heart rate in the control state was negative, unless filling was controlled, and it was flat in heart failure. In contrast, the time constants of mechanical restitution and postextrasystolic potentiation were increased significantly with heart failure from 91 +/- 25 (SD) to 164 +/- 13 ms and from 107 +/- 18 to 156 +/- 4 ms, respectively, for dP/dtmax and from 76 +/- 22 to 162 +/- 10 ms and from 101 +/- 17 to 160 +/- 17 ms, respectively, for systolic wall thickening. These time constants were, however, insensitive to UL-FS 49 and autonomic blockade. There was a negative force-frequency relation in left ventricular trabeculae from non-failing hearts at higher calcium concentrations, where it was flat in trabeculae from failing hearts.

CONCLUSION

Time constants of mechanical restitution and postextrasystolic potentiation are more sensitive than the steady state relation of ventricular function and heart rate to characterize the impairment of excitation-contraction coupling in heart failure.