Bond M R
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1976;34(1-4):57-70. doi: 10.1007/BF01405863.
Increasing numbers of those concerned with the primary treatment and later care of individuals who sustain head injuries are becoming interested in the development of methods for assessing the outcome of severe brain damage. In the past such methods seldom involved balanced consideration of the physical, mental and social sequelae of injury. Moreover rehabilitation, which should involve restoration of patients to their fullest physical, mental and social capability, is often biased towards the improvement of physical disability alone. The long lasting and chronically disabling mental changes which occur so frequently, and which tend to cause the greatest difficulties for patients in terms of their reintegration into society, usually receive scant attention. Assessment of outcome necessitates evaluation of the contribution of both physiogenic and psychogenic factors to the patient's mental state, and thus their respective contributions to the degree of social integration achieved. With these points in mind a pilot study was designed to evaluate three simple indices of outcome--namely neurophysical, mental and social assessment scales. The relation of each scale to the severity of brain damage, assessed in terms of post-traumatic amnesia, was examined. The relation of the scales to each other and to measures of cognitive function (the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) were also considered, Results from 56 severely brain injured patients reveals a clear cut relation between the duration of post-traumatic amnesia and the measures of disability devised. Further, social disability was related to the level of physical and mental handicap, but it was the latter which caused the most severe problems. The level of intellectual recovery was related to all scales of disability and to the duration of post-traumatic amnesia, although the latter proved to be a less accurate predictor of the ultimate degree of intellectual recovery than was expected.
越来越多关注头部受伤患者初级治疗及后续护理的人,对开发评估严重脑损伤后果的方法产生了兴趣。过去,此类方法很少全面考虑损伤的身体、心理和社会后遗症。此外,康复治疗本应使患者在身体、心理和社会能力方面恢复到最佳状态,但往往仅侧重于改善身体残疾。频繁出现的长期且导致慢性残疾的心理变化,在患者重新融入社会方面往往造成最大困难,却通常很少受到关注。评估后果需要评估生理因素和心理因素对患者心理状态的影响,以及它们各自对所实现的社会融合程度的贡献。基于这些考虑,设计了一项试点研究来评估三个简单的后果指标,即神经物理、心理和社会评估量表。研究了每个量表与根据创伤后遗忘症评估的脑损伤严重程度之间的关系。还考虑了各量表之间的关系以及与认知功能测量(韦氏成人智力量表)的关系。56名严重脑损伤患者的结果显示,创伤后遗忘症的持续时间与所设计的残疾测量指标之间存在明显的关系。此外,社会残疾与身体和心理残疾程度相关,但后者造成的问题最为严重。智力恢复水平与所有残疾量表以及创伤后遗忘症的持续时间相关,尽管事实证明,与预期相比,后者对最终智力恢复程度的预测准确性较低。