Bissett J K, Kane J J, de Soyza N, Murphy M L, McConnell J R
Am Heart J. 1976 Oct;92(4):459-64. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(76)80045-2.
Although sinus node function has been evaluated during premature atrial stimulation, no study of retrograde ventriculoatrial sinus node activation following premature ventricular stimuli has been reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate the production of compensatory and noncompensatory pauses by premature ventricular contractions through a comparison of the effects of atrial and ventricular stimulation on sinus node function. Eleven patients in sinus rhythm were studied with programmed introduction of premature atrial and ventricular stimuli outside the ventricular vulnerable period. The onset of sinus node reset, duration of return sinus cycle (A2-A3) during reset, and estimated sinoatrial conduction times were recorded. Sinus node function during premature ventricular stimulation was approximated by utilizing the interval between the last sinus beat and onset of retrograde atrial depolarization (A1-A2 interval). The return cycle length (A2-A3) during sinus reset compared at equal A1-A2 intervals was significantly less with ventriculoatrial conduction (1,145 +/- 52 msec. atrial vs. 1,076 +/- 52 msec ventriculoatrial; P less than 0.01 by paired t test) and the estimated sinoatrial conduction time was significantly less with ventriculoatrial conduction (71 +/- 7 msec. atrial vs. 25 +/- 7 msec. ventriculoatrial; P less than 0.01 by paired t test). Ventriculoatrial sinus reset occurred later in the sinus cycle than atrial reset in three of seven patients with sinus reset produced by both atrial and ventricular prematures. This study shows that the effects of ventriculoatrial conduction on sinus node function are significantly different from those of atrial stimulation alone. The return sinus cycle length during reset and estimated sinoatrial conduction time are significantly reduced with ventriculoatrial conduction. Although the zones of sinus reset with atrial and ventricular stimulation are approximately equal, ventriculoatrial depolarization may produce sinus reset later in the sinus cycle in some cases.
尽管已在房性早搏刺激期间评估了窦房结功能,但尚未见有关室性早搏后逆行性室房窦房结激动的研究报道。本研究的目的是通过比较心房和心室刺激对窦房结功能的影响,探讨室性早搏产生代偿性和非代偿性间歇的机制。对11例窦性心律患者在心室易损期外进行程控心房和心室早搏刺激研究。记录窦房结重置的起始、重置期间返回窦性周期(A2 - A3)的持续时间以及估计的窦房传导时间。利用最后一个窦性搏动与逆行心房去极化起始之间的间期(A1 - A2间期)来估算室性早搏刺激期间的窦房结功能。在相等的A1 - A2间期下比较窦性重置期间的返回周期长度(A2 - A3),室房传导时明显更短(心房传导为1145±52毫秒,室房传导为1076±52毫秒;配对t检验,P<0.01),且估计的窦房传导时间在室房传导时也明显更短(心房传导为71±7毫秒,室房传导为25±7毫秒;配对t检验,P<0.01)。在7例由心房和心室早搏均产生窦性重置的患者中,有3例室房窦房结重置发生在窦性周期中比心房重置更晚的时间。本研究表明,室房传导对窦房结功能的影响与单纯心房刺激的影响显著不同。室房传导时,重置期间的返回窦性周期长度和估计的窦房传导时间明显缩短。尽管心房和心室刺激引起的窦性重置区域大致相等,但在某些情况下,室房去极化可能在窦性周期中更晚产生窦性重置。