Drago F, Mazza A, Garibaldi S, Mafrici A, Santilli A, Ragonese P
Dipartimento Medico-Chirurgico di, Cardiologia Pediatrica, Ospedale Bambino Gesù, Roma.
G Ital Cardiol. 1998 Apr;28(4):365-8.
Concern exists in literature about the clinical course, the best acute and chronic treatment and the prognosis of idiopathic neonatal atrial flutter. The aim of our study was to evaluate this in a population of our patients with this type of arrhythmia.
Six infants (3 M, 3 F, mean age 42 +/- 62 days, range 1-150) affected with atrial flutter without structural heart disease were studied and then acutely and chronically treated. The effectiveness of chronic antiarrhythmic treatment was evaluated with Holter monitoring every 3 months for the first year of life and with transesophageal atrial pacing.
Mean arrhythmia cycle length was 180 +/- 34 ms with atrioventricular conduction ratio ranging between 1:1 and 3:1. Two patients with clinical signs of heart failure were successfully treated with DC shock. Transesophageal overdrive atrial pacing was successfully used in one patient treated with i.v. propafenone without benefit. In the remaining three patients, cardioversion was achieved with amiodarone after digoxin had failed in all three and propafenone had failed in two of them. To prevent recurrences, we treated four patients with amiodarone, one with amiodarone combined with propranolol and one with digoxin. During the follow-up (22 +/- 11 months), neither arrhythmia recurrences nor side-effects of the therapy occurred.
Neonatal atrial flutter is an arrhythmia with significant acute morbidity but an excellent long-term prognosis. Electrical cardioversion is the first-choice treatment when the arrhythmia is not well-tolerated hemodynamically, while class III antiarrhythmic drugs such as amiodarone should be preferred in the other cases.
文献中对特发性新生儿房扑的临床病程、最佳急慢性治疗方法及预后存在关注。我们研究的目的是在患有此类心律失常的患者群体中对此进行评估。
对6例无结构性心脏病的房扑婴儿(3例男性,3例女性,平均年龄42±62天,范围1 - 150天)进行研究,然后进行急慢性治疗。在生命的第一年,每3个月通过动态心电图监测评估慢性抗心律失常治疗的有效性,并进行经食管心房起搏。
平均心律失常周期长度为180±34毫秒,房室传导比例在1:1至3:1之间。2例有心力衰竭临床体征的患者通过直流电休克成功治疗。经食管超速心房起搏成功应用于1例静脉注射普罗帕酮无效的患者。在其余3例患者中,地高辛对所有3例均无效,普罗帕酮对其中2例无效后,胺碘酮实现了心脏复律。为预防复发,我们对4例患者用胺碘酮治疗,1例用胺碘酮联合普萘洛尔治疗,1例用地高辛治疗。在随访期间(22±11个月),未发生心律失常复发及治疗副作用。
新生儿房扑是一种急性发病率较高但长期预后良好的心律失常。当心律失常在血流动力学上耐受性不佳时,电复律是首选治疗方法,而在其他情况下,应优先选用Ⅲ类抗心律失常药物如胺碘酮。