Oddera S, Silvestri M, Penna R, Galeazzi G, Crimi E, Rossi G A
Divisione di Pneumologia, Istituto G. Gaslini, Genova, Italy.
Lung. 1998;176(4):237-47. doi: 10.1007/pl00007606.
Allergen exposure in atopic asthmatic patients is associated with recruitment and activation of eosinophils in the airways. Once activated, eosinophils release toxic products, including the eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), able to damage bronchial structures and to increase bronchial hyperresponsiveness. With this background, the present study was designed to evaluate whether ECP levels in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid could reflect, better than BAL eosinophil counts, the cellular activation that follows allergen exposure in atopic asthmatics. Twenty-two atopic patients attended the laboratory on two separate days. On the 1st day, they underwent methacholine (MCh) inhalation challenge to detect the degree of nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness. On the 2nd day, they underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy and BAL, at baseline or 4-6 h after allergen inhalation challenge. In this latter patient group, MCh challenge was repeated 3-5 h after allergen challenge, 1 h before fiberoptic bronchoscopy. The analysis of the mean baseline FEV1 values and the degree of bronchial reactivity to MCh (MCh Pd20) on the 1st study day did not demonstrate differences between the two patient groups (p > 0.1, each comparison). In addition, in the allergen-challenged group, MCh Pd20 was decreased significantly after allergen challenge (151.4 micrograms/ml and 67.6 micrograms/ml, respectively, before and after challenge; p < 0.05). Evaluation of the different BAL cell types demonstrated that the proportions of eosinophils and epithelial cells were increased significantly in the allergen-challenged group compared with the group evaluated at baseline (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). Moreover, ECP levels, corrected by the correspondent albumin levels (ECP/Alb), were higher in the allergen-challenged group compared with the group evaluated at baseline (p < 0.05). In addition, although a positive correlation was demonstrated between BAL eosinophil percentages and ECP/Alb values (r = 0.72, p < 0.05) in the group evaluated at baseline, no links were found between these parameters in the allergen-challenged group (p > 0.1). However, in this latter group, a weak positive correlation was demonstrated between eosinophil percentages and delta Mch, i.e., the increased non-specific bronchial reactivity, which is observed after allergen challenge (r = 0.55; p < 0.05). Thus, in stable asthmatic patients an ongoing activation of eosinophils parallels their migration, but this eosinophilic inflammation is not strictly related to bronchial reactivity to Mch. By contrast, after allergen inhalation challenge, eosinophil recruitment and activation seem to follow different temporal kinetics, and eosinophilic inflammation may be partially associated with the degree of airway hyperresponsiveness.
特应性哮喘患者暴露于变应原与气道中嗜酸性粒细胞的募集和激活有关。一旦被激活,嗜酸性粒细胞会释放包括嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白(ECP)在内的毒性产物,这些产物能够破坏支气管结构并增加支气管高反应性。基于此背景,本研究旨在评估支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)液中的ECP水平是否比BAL嗜酸性粒细胞计数能更好地反映特应性哮喘患者变应原暴露后的细胞激活情况。22名特应性患者在两个不同的日子到实验室就诊。第一天,他们接受了乙酰甲胆碱(MCh)吸入激发试验以检测非特异性支气管高反应性的程度。第二天,他们在基线时或变应原吸入激发试验后4 - 6小时接受了纤维支气管镜检查和BAL。在后一组患者中,在变应原激发试验后3 - 5小时、纤维支气管镜检查前1小时重复进行MCh激发试验。对第一项研究日的平均基线FEV1值和对MCh的支气管反应性程度(MCh Pd20)的分析未显示两组患者之间存在差异(每次比较p > 0.1)。此外,在变应原激发组中,变应原激发后MCh Pd20显著降低(激发前和激发后分别为151.4微克/毫升和67.6微克/毫升;p < 0.05)。对不同BAL细胞类型的评估表明,与基线评估组相比,变应原激发组中嗜酸性粒细胞和上皮细胞的比例显著增加(分别为p < 0.01和p < 0.05)。此外,与基线评估组相比,变应原激发组中经相应白蛋白水平校正后的ECP水平(ECP/Alb)更高(p < 0.05)。另外,虽然在基线评估组中BAL嗜酸性粒细胞百分比与ECP/Alb值之间存在正相关(r = 0.72,p < 0.05),但在变应原激发组中未发现这些参数之间的关联(p > 0.1)。然而,在变应原激发组中,嗜酸性粒细胞百分比与δMch之间存在弱正相关,即变应原激发后观察到的非特异性支气管反应性增加(r = 0.55;p < 0.05)。因此,在稳定的哮喘患者中,嗜酸性粒细胞的持续激活与其迁移平行,但这种嗜酸性粒细胞炎症与对Mch的支气管反应性并不严格相关。相比之下,变应原吸入激发后,嗜酸性粒细胞的募集和激活似乎遵循不同的时间动力学,并且嗜酸性粒细胞炎症可能部分与气道高反应性程度相关。