Jean-Claude B J, Mustafa A, Damian Z, De Marte J, Vasilescu D E, Yen R, Chan T H, Leyland-Jones B
Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1998;42(1):59-67. doi: 10.1007/s002800050785.
Cytotoxicity, reduction of macromolecule synthesis and cell cycle perturbations by two novel 3-(2-chloroethyl)-tetrazepinones, PYRCL and QUINCL were compared with those produced by the structurally related 3-(2-chloroethyl)-tetrazinone, mitozolomide, in the OVCAR-3 cell line.
Macromolecule synthesis was determined by incorporation of 3H-thymidine, 3H-uridine and 3H-leucine into acid-precipitable fractions of OVCAR-3 cell extracts. Maxam-Gilbert sequencing was used to compare the DNA alkylating sites induced by the tetrazepinones, with those created by mitozolomide. Alkaline sucrose-density sedimentation was employed to detect genomic DNA damage. Also, the effects of the tetrazepinones on the cell cycle were determined by univariate flow cytometry.
At 3 h post-treatment, mitozolomide appeared as a selective inhibitor of DNA synthesis, while both tetrazepinones inhibited the synthesis of all three macromolecules. At 24 h post-treatment, the inhibition of DNA synthesis was observed to increase in cells treated with mitozolomide, while it decreased in those previously exposed to the tetrazepinones. Also at 24 h post-treatment, mitozolomide induced accumulation of cells in S(late)/G2M at low concentrations and in S-middle at high concentrations. In contrast, at the same recovery time, cells treated with the tetrazepinones accumulated specifically in G2M, the strength of the block being dose-dependent. At an equimolar concentration, the tetrazepinones induced weaker guanine N-7 alkylation than mitozolomide. By 24 h after treatment, cells exposed to the tetrazepinones showed significantly greater DNA fragmentation than those previously treated with mitozolomide.
In summary, based on (a) their effects on DNA, RNA, protein synthesis and on the cell cycle, (b) their alkylating power and (c) their interactions with DNA, the 3-(2-chloroethyl)tetrazepinones appeared to kill tumor cells by a novel mechanism which may significantly differ from that of their 3-(2-chloroethyl)-tetrazinone counterpart, mitozolomide.
在OVCAR-3细胞系中,将两种新型3-(2-氯乙基)-四氮杂卓酮(PYRCL和QUINCL)的细胞毒性、大分子合成减少及细胞周期扰动情况与结构相关的3-(2-氯乙基)-四嗪酮(米托唑胺)所产生的情况进行了比较。
通过将³H-胸腺嘧啶核苷、³H-尿苷和³H-亮氨酸掺入OVCAR-3细胞提取物的酸沉淀部分来测定大分子合成。使用Maxam-Gilbert测序法比较四氮杂卓酮诱导的DNA烷基化位点与米托唑胺产生的位点。采用碱性蔗糖密度沉降法检测基因组DNA损伤。此外,通过单变量流式细胞术测定四氮杂卓酮对细胞周期的影响。
处理后3小时,米托唑胺表现为DNA合成的选择性抑制剂,而两种四氮杂卓酮均抑制所有三种大分子的合成。处理后24小时,观察到米托唑胺处理的细胞中DNA合成抑制增加,而先前暴露于四氮杂卓酮的细胞中DNA合成抑制减少。同样在处理后24小时,米托唑胺在低浓度时诱导细胞在S期后期/G2M期积累,在高浓度时诱导细胞在S期中期积累。相比之下,在相同的恢复时间,用四氮杂卓酮处理的细胞特异性地在G2M期积累,阻滞强度呈剂量依赖性。在等摩尔浓度下,四氮杂卓酮诱导的鸟嘌呤N-7烷基化比米托唑胺弱。处理后24小时,暴露于四氮杂卓酮的细胞比先前用米托唑胺处理的细胞表现出明显更大的DNA片段化。
总之,基于(a)它们对DNA、RNA、蛋白质合成及细胞周期的影响,(b)它们的烷基化能力,以及(c)它们与DNA的相互作用,3-(2-氯乙基)四氮杂卓酮似乎通过一种可能与其3-(2-氯乙基)-四嗪酮同类物米托唑胺显著不同的新机制杀死肿瘤细胞。