Perry H M, Roccella E J
Department of Veterans Affairs and Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. perry.h mitchell
Hypertension. 1998 Jun;31(6):1206-15. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.31.6.1206.
A workshop to describe and then seek possible causes for the increased stroke mortality in the southeastern United States briefly considered 30 suspected correlates and discussed in more detail the 10 thought to be most likely. Recent age-adjusted stroke mortality rates in adults from industrialized countries reveal marked geographic differences. Age-adjusted statewide stroke mortality rates also differ, and they are higher in the Southeast than elsewhere in the United States. For five southeastern coastal states in the heart of the "Stroke Belt," excess stroke mortality has been present at least since 1930. In a 20-year follow-up of 10,000 veterans, the Stroke Belt had a 25% increase in all-cause mortality and congestive heart failure. A potential cause of increased fatal stroke included hypertension, which was more frequent in the Stroke Belt. No consistent patterns of lifestyle differences or of differences in potassium or calcium intake seemed to explain the higher rates of fatal strokes in the Stroke Belt; however, detailed investigations of smaller populations in localized areas seem warranted. Some data suggest a relationship between socioeconomic status and the Stroke Belt effect. Other differences in the Southeast that could explain, at least partially, the Stroke Belt effect include presence of soft water throughout most of the area, decreased antioxidant intake, and differences in the use of medical care and in the response to antihypertensive drugs. On the basis of available information, the three most likely explanations or partial explanations for the Stroke Belt are increased levels of blood pressure, localized differences in socioeconomic status, and toxic environmental factor(s). Two major recommendations were made: (1) to encourage both patient and caregiver to use all currently available means of decreasing morbidity and mortality by controlling blood pressures at or below normal levels and by reducing other risk factors and (2) to seek precise information about relationships of identified possible causes of increased morbidity and mortality in the Stroke Belt.
一场旨在描述美国东南部卒中死亡率上升情况并探寻可能原因的研讨会,简要审议了30个可疑相关因素,并更详细地讨论了被认为最有可能的10个因素。工业化国家成年人近期的年龄调整卒中死亡率显示出明显的地域差异。各州的年龄调整卒中死亡率也存在差异,美国东南部的死亡率高于其他地区。在“卒中带”中心的五个东南部沿海州,至少自1930年以来就存在卒中死亡率过高的情况。在对10000名退伍军人进行的20年随访中,“卒中带”的全因死亡率和充血性心力衰竭增加了25%。致命性卒中增加的一个潜在原因是高血压,在“卒中带”更为常见。生活方式差异或钾、钙摄入量差异似乎无法一致地解释“卒中带”致命性卒中发生率较高的情况;然而,对局部地区较小人群进行详细调查似乎是有必要的。一些数据表明社会经济地位与“卒中带”效应之间存在关联。东南部的其他差异,至少可以部分解释“卒中带”效应,包括该地区大部分地区存在软水、抗氧化剂摄入量减少,以及医疗保健使用和对抗高血压药物反应方面的差异。根据现有信息,对“卒中带”最有可能的三种解释或部分解释是血压水平升高、社会经济地位的局部差异以及有毒环境因素。提出了两项主要建议:(1)鼓励患者和护理人员通过将血压控制在正常水平或以下并减少其他风险因素,利用所有现有的降低发病率和死亡率的方法;(2)寻求有关“卒中带”发病率和死亡率增加的已确定可能原因之间关系的精确信息。