Ecker K W, Hultén L
Abteilung für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Abdominal- und Gefässchirurgie, Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Homburg/Saar.
Zentralbl Chir. 1998;123(4):331-7.
Most patients with Crohn's disease have to be operated on. Necessity to loose some amount of the intestine and time-point of the surgical intervention may be derived from the irreversible cascade of the inflammatory process and the limitations of the conservative treatment. In ileocecal disease indications for surgery are represented by stenotic and/or penetrating complications of the inflamed bowel, whereas in Crohn's colitis acute or terminal medical refractority is predominating. Standard-procedures result from constantly definable patterns of the disease manifestation: ileocecal resection and colectomy/-proctocolectomy. In segmental colitis sometimes "resections within Crohn's" may be adequate in a first attempt to avoid anticipating the natural course by surgical means. In these cases the further prognosis depends on the treatment possibilities of the remaining colon. In contrast, true recurrence is a new inflammation of the neoterminal ileum and may indicate repeated resections. The frequence decreases with the number of resections. Nevertheless nutritional status is restored even by multiple resections, whereas specific functional sequelae of the resection--distal resection- and dehydration syndromes--are well treatable mostly. In the case of appropriate timing of the operation and the reoperation operative morbidity and mortality are remarkable low today resulting in an almost normal life expectancy. Most important as negative prognostic factor remains sepsis resulting from pre-existing or postoperative infectious complications. Keeping this in mind experimental pharmaco-therapy to delay the operation and not profoundly substantiated tendencies to minimize surgery are to be considered only with critical scepticism. At the moment, future research is thought to be more successful in focussing prophylaxis of ileal recurrence than avoiding surgery.
大多数克罗恩病患者都必须接受手术治疗。切除部分肠段的必要性以及手术干预的时间点,可能源于炎症过程不可逆转的级联反应以及保守治疗的局限性。在回盲部疾病中,手术指征表现为发炎肠段的狭窄和/或穿透性并发症,而在克罗恩结肠炎中,急性或终末期药物难治性则较为突出。标准手术程序源自疾病表现的恒定可定义模式:回盲部切除术和结肠切除术/全直肠结肠切除术。在节段性结肠炎中,有时首次尝试进行“克罗恩病范围内的切除术”可能就足够了,以避免通过手术手段改变自然病程。在这些情况下,进一步的预后取决于剩余结肠的治疗可能性。相比之下,真正的复发是新末端回肠的炎症,可能需要再次切除。复发频率会随着切除次数的增加而降低。然而,即使进行多次切除,营养状况仍可恢复,而切除的特定功能后遗症——远端切除和脱水综合征——大多可以得到很好的治疗。如果手术和再次手术的时机合适,如今手术的发病率和死亡率极低,患者的预期寿命几乎正常。作为负面预后因素,最重要的仍然是术前或术后感染并发症导致的败血症。牢记这一点,对于仅以批判性怀疑态度考虑的延迟手术的实验性药物治疗以及未得到充分证实的尽量减少手术的趋势,都应持谨慎态度。目前,人们认为未来的研究在预防回肠复发方面比避免手术更有可能取得成功。