Nyholm B, Fineman M S, Koda J E, Schmitz O
Department of Medicine M (Endocrinology and Diabetes), Aarhus Kommunehospital, University Hospital of Aarhus, Denmark.
Horm Metab Res. 1998 Apr;30(4):206-12. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-978867.
To explore the potential relationship between concentrations of circulating amylin and the insulin resistance observed in first-degree relatives of patients with non-insulin-dependent-diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), we studied 40 relatives compared to 35 matched controls. Two newly developed immunoassays that measure either non-glycosylated or total amylin were applied. All subjects were examined by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and by a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (insulin infusion: 0.6 mU/kg/min). Glucose tolerance was normal in all, but insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (Rd) was diminished in the relatives (p < 0.001). Area under the curves (AUCs) during OGTT for plasma glucose (p < 0.01) and serum insulin (p=0.08), but not for plasma total and non-glycosylated amylin, were higher in relatives versus controls. In both groups, inverse correlations were found between Rd and AUC for plasma total and non-glycosylated amylin (p [all]<0.05). However, in multiple linear regression analyses, plasma total and non-glycosylated amylin failed to influence Rd independent of serum insulin and family history-of NIDDM. In conclusion, this study demonstrated inverse correlations between Rd and circulating concentrations of plasma total and non-glycosylated amylin in relatives and matched controls. These data, however, do not support the hypothesis that physiological amylin concentration are a major importance for the insulin resistance in relatives of NIDDM patients.
为了探究非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)患者一级亲属中循环胰岛淀粉样多肽浓度与胰岛素抵抗之间的潜在关系,我们研究了40名亲属,并与35名匹配的对照者进行比较。应用了两种新开发的免疫测定法,分别测量非糖基化或总胰岛淀粉样多肽。所有受试者均接受口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)和高胰岛素正常血糖钳夹试验(胰岛素输注:0.6 mU/kg/min)。所有人的葡萄糖耐量均正常,但亲属中胰岛素刺激的葡萄糖摄取(Rd)降低(p<0.001)。与对照组相比,亲属在OGTT期间血浆葡萄糖曲线下面积(AUC)(p<0.01)和血清胰岛素曲线下面积(p=0.08)更高,但血浆总胰岛淀粉样多肽和非糖基化胰岛淀粉样多肽的曲线下面积并非如此。在两组中,均发现Rd与血浆总胰岛淀粉样多肽和非糖基化胰岛淀粉样多肽的AUC之间呈负相关(p[均]<0.05)。然而,在多元线性回归分析中,血浆总胰岛淀粉样多肽和非糖基化胰岛淀粉样多肽在独立于血清胰岛素和NIDDM家族史的情况下未能影响Rd。总之,本研究表明亲属和匹配对照者中Rd与血浆总胰岛淀粉样多肽和非糖基化胰岛淀粉样多肽的循环浓度之间存在负相关。然而,这些数据并不支持生理胰岛淀粉样多肽浓度对NIDDM患者亲属的胰岛素抵抗至关重要这一假设。