• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risks in therapeutic portacaval and splenorenal shunts.治疗性门腔分流术和脾肾分流术的风险。
Ann Surg. 1976 Sep;184(3):279-88. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197609000-00005.
2
Matched control study of distal splenorenal and portacaval shunts in the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices.脾肾分流术与门腔分流术治疗食管静脉曲张出血的配对对照研究。
Am J Surg. 1979 Jul;138(1):62-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(79)90243-5.
3
Conventional splenorenal shunts. A reconsideration.
Arch Surg. 1975 May;110(5):588-93. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360110134022.
4
Selection of operation in patients with bleeding esophageal varices.食管静脉曲张出血患者的手术选择。
Can Med Assoc J. 1978 Feb 18;118(4):369-72.
5
The clinical effectiveness of selective portal shunts.选择性门体分流术的临床疗效。
Am J Surg. 1977 Apr;133(4):506-11. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90140-4.
6
Elective, semielective and emergency splenorenal shunt in the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices.选择性、半选择性及急诊脾肾分流术治疗食管静脉曲张出血
Isr J Med Sci. 1973 Jan;9(1):12-8.
7
A prospective randomized trial of the selective distal splenorenal shunt.选择性远端脾肾分流术的前瞻性随机试验。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1980 Jan;150(1):45-8.
8
Prospective comparative clinical trial with distal splenorenal and mesocaval shunts.远端脾肾分流术与肠系膜上腔静脉分流术的前瞻性对比临床试验。
Am J Surg. 1979 Jan;137(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(79)90004-7.
9
Elective management of the patient who has bled from esophageal varices.
Can J Surg. 1979 Nov;22(6):554-5.
10
Selective distal splenorenal shunt for bleeding esophageal varices.选择性远端脾肾分流术治疗食管静脉曲张破裂出血
Annu Rev Med. 1975;26:229-34. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.26.020175.001305.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of bleeding esophageal varices.食管静脉曲张出血的管理
West J Med. 1982 Feb;136(2):143-5.
2
Operations for management of esophageal variceal hemorrhage.食管静脉曲张出血的管理手术
West J Med. 1982 Feb;136(2):107-21.
3
The Linton splenorenal shunt in the management of the bleeding complications of portal hypertension.林顿脾肾分流术在门静脉高压出血并发症治疗中的应用
Ann Surg. 1982 Dec;196(6):664-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198212001-00008.
4
[The emergency portacaval shunt in the treatment of persistent hemorrhage from gastroesophageal varices (author's transl)].急诊门腔分流术治疗食管胃静脉曲张持续出血(作者译)
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1980;353(2):81-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01254769.
5
Transhepatic embolization of varices: a surgeon's view.经肝门静脉栓塞术:外科医生的观点。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1980;3(4):303-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02552749.
6
Impact of preshunt liver histology on survival following portasystemic shunt surgery for bleeding esophageal varices.分流术前肝脏组织学对食管静脉曲张破裂出血门体分流术后生存的影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 1983 Jan;28(1):44-55. doi: 10.1007/BF01393360.
7
The Eck fistula in animals and humans.动物和人类的艾克瘘管。
Curr Probl Surg. 1983 Nov;20(11):687-752. doi: 10.1016/s0011-3840(83)80010-0.
8
Prognostic factors in survival after portasystemic shunts. Multivariate analysis.门体分流术后生存的预后因素。多变量分析。
Ann Surg. 1985 Dec;202(6):729-34. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198512000-00012.
9
Factors affecting immediate and long-term survival after emergent and elective splanchnic-systemic shunts.影响急诊和择期内脏-体循环分流术后近期和远期生存的因素。
Ann Surg. 1985 Apr;201(4):476-87. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198504000-00013.
10
Factors predicing survival after portacaval shunt: a multiple linear regression analysis.预测门腔分流术后生存的因素:多元线性回归分析
Ann Surg. 1978 Feb;187(2):174-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197802000-00014.

本文引用的文献

1
Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival.在分析生存情况时最大限度地利用生命表法。
J Chronic Dis. 1958 Dec;8(6):699-712. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7.
2
Selection of patients for portal-systemic shunts.
JAMA. 1966 Jun 20;196(12):1039-44.
3
End to side versus side to side portacaval shunts in patients with hepatic cirrhosis.肝硬化患者端侧与侧侧门腔分流术的比较
Am J Surg. 1969 Jan;117(1):108-16. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(69)90291-8.
4
Postshunt encephalopathy.分流术后脑病
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1968 Mar;126(3):585-90.
5
[Prognosis for portacaval anastomosis for cirrhosis: contribution of discrimination and factorial analysis of correspondences].
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 1971 Feb;34(2):248-62.
6
Encephalopathy and portacaval anastomosis.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1970;5(8):681-5.
7
Portasystemic shunting procedures for portal hypertension. Twenty-six year experience in adults with cirrhosis of the liver.
Am J Surg. 1970 May;119(5):501-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(70)90162-5.
8
Selective portal decompression.
Surgery. 1970 Jan;67(1):104-13.
9
Elective portasystemic shunts: morbidity and survival data.选择性门体分流术:发病率及生存数据。
Ann Surg. 1971 Jul;174(1):76-84. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197107010-00013.
10
Quantity and quality of survival after portosystemic shunts.
Am J Surg. 1971 Apr;121(4):490-501. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(71)90245-5.

治疗性门腔分流术和脾肾分流术的风险。

Risks in therapeutic portacaval and splenorenal shunts.

作者信息

Malt R A, Szczerban J, Malt R B

出版信息

Ann Surg. 1976 Sep;184(3):279-88. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197609000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00000658-197609000-00005
PMID:962396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1344381/
Abstract

Analyses of the records of 120 patients who underwent portacaval shunting (PCS, 57%) or splenorenal shunting (SRS, 43%) from 1966-1973 disclosed that patients in each group undergoing elective shunts had the same preoperative physical condition and postoperative mortality rates (approximately 20%). Although the post-operative death rate from emergency shunts was 48%, patients having these procedures were poorer risks. Long-term incidences of encephalopathy were the same, irrespective of the type of shunt (PCS, 46%; SRS 36%, P greater than 0.5). Despite comparisons of data most unfavorable for PCS, 5-year survival rates were also the same after either type of shunt (all PCS, 29 +/- 7.5%, SRS, 42.0 +/- 7.4%, P = 0.23). The survival rate after elective PCS was also the same as after SRS during the entire 5-year period. However, the survival after all elective PCS and SRS was significantly greater than after emergency PCS (P range = 0.005-0.038); the poorer results of emergency shunting could be partly attributed to the poorer condition of patients selected. A numerical score based on serum bilirubin concentrations, ascites, and urgency of shunting reliably predicts postoperative mortality. Long-term encephalopathy is predicted by a history of encephalopathy and the urgency of shunting.

摘要

对1966年至1973年间接受门腔分流术(PCS,57%)或脾肾分流术(SRS,43%)的120例患者的记录分析显示,每组接受择期分流术的患者术前身体状况和术后死亡率相同(约20%)。尽管急诊分流术后的死亡率为48%,但接受这些手术的患者风险更高。无论分流类型如何,脑病的长期发生率相同(PCS为46%;SRS为36%,P>0.5)。尽管对PCS最不利的数据进行了比较,但两种分流术后的5年生存率也相同(所有PCS为29±7.5%,SRS为42.0±7.4%,P=0.23)。在整个5年期间,择期PCS后的生存率也与SRS后的生存率相同。然而,所有择期PCS和SRS后的生存率显著高于急诊PCS后的生存率(P范围=0.005 - 0.038);急诊分流术结果较差部分可归因于所选患者的病情较差。基于血清胆红素浓度、腹水和分流紧迫性的数值评分可可靠预测术后死亡率。脑病病史和分流紧迫性可预测长期脑病。