• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门体分流术后生存的预后因素。多变量分析。

Prognostic factors in survival after portasystemic shunts. Multivariate analysis.

作者信息

Lacaine F, LaMuraglia G M, Malt R A

出版信息

Ann Surg. 1985 Dec;202(6):729-34. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198512000-00012.

DOI:10.1097/00000658-198512000-00012
PMID:4073985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1251007/
Abstract

Multivariate analyses correlated short-term survival and long-term survival with clinical data from 141 patients with portasystemic shunts for bleeding esophageal varices over the 8 years from 1974 through 1981. By logistic regression analysis, the elements with independent prognostic significance for operative death were an emergency operation, serum albumin and bilirubin levels, age, and sex. A cutpoint probability value of 0.75 marked the single level above which 84% of patients could be expected to survive, but below which 77% are likely to die. By a Cox regression model, elements with independent prognostic significance were identical. Male sex (p = 0.02) and prolonged partial thromboplastin time (p = 0.04) indicated a poor prognosis after an emergency operation; after an elective operation only the serum albumin level was prognostic (p = 0.02). Normal blood clotting is the major determinant of survival after an emergency shunt, and the serum albumin level chiefly determines survival after elective portasystemic decompression.

摘要

多变量分析将1974年至1981年这8年间141例因食管静脉曲张出血而接受门体分流术患者的短期生存和长期生存与临床数据进行了关联。通过逻辑回归分析,对手术死亡具有独立预后意义的因素包括急诊手术、血清白蛋白和胆红素水平、年龄及性别。切点概率值为0.75时标志着一个单一水平,高于此水平预计84%的患者能够存活,但低于此水平则77%的患者可能死亡。通过Cox回归模型,具有独立预后意义的因素相同。男性(p = 0.02)和部分凝血活酶时间延长(p = 0.04)表明急诊手术后预后不良;择期手术后只有血清白蛋白水平具有预后意义(p = 0.02)。正常凝血是急诊分流术后生存的主要决定因素,而血清白蛋白水平主要决定择期门体减压术后的生存情况。

相似文献

1
Prognostic factors in survival after portasystemic shunts. Multivariate analysis.门体分流术后生存的预后因素。多变量分析。
Ann Surg. 1985 Dec;202(6):729-34. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198512000-00012.
2
Factors influencing survival after therapeutic shunts. Results of a discriminant function and linear logistic regressions analysis.
Am J Surg. 1981 Feb;141(2):257-65. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(81)90170-7.
3
[Portosystemic shunts in the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients: between sclerotherapy and transplantation].[门体分流术在肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张出血治疗中的应用:介于硬化疗法与肝移植之间]
Minerva Chir. 1996 Nov;51(11):887-95.
4
Outcomes of surgical shunts and transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic stent shunts for complicated portal hypertension.外科分流术和经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗复杂门静脉高压症的结果。
Br J Surg. 2017 Mar;104(4):443-451. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10431. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
5
Prospective comparison of partial versus total portal decompression for bleeding esophageal varices.出血性食管静脉曲张部分门静脉减压与完全门静脉减压的前瞻性比较。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Dec;175(6):528-34.
6
Variceal hemorrhage in the veteran population. To shunt or not to shunt?
Am Surg. 1984 May;50(5):264-9.
7
[Emergency and early portasystemic shunt: indications and results].[急诊与早期门体分流术:适应症与结果]
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir. 1990:377-85.
8
[Bleeding esophageal varices: evaluation of medical and emergency surgical treatment].[食管静脉曲张破裂出血:内科及急诊外科治疗评估]
G E N. 1980 Jan-Mar;34(1):55-63.
9
Is portal-systemic shunt worthwhile in Child's class C cirrhosis? Long-term results of emergency shunt in 94 patients with bleeding varices.门静脉-体静脉分流术对Child C级肝硬化患者是否值得?94例静脉曲张出血患者急诊分流的长期结果。
Ann Surg. 1992 Sep;216(3):256-66; discussion 266-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199209000-00005.
10
Factors predicting survival after portosystemic shunt.预测门体分流术后生存的因素。
Am Surg. 1982 Jan;48(1):32-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Ten years portal hypertensive surgery at Emory. Results and new perspectives.埃默里大学十年门静脉高压手术:结果与新展望
Ann Surg. 1982 May;195(5):530-42. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198205000-00002.
2
Reporting on methods in clinical trials.临床试验方法报告。
N Engl J Med. 1982 Jun 3;306(22):1332-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198206033062204.
3
Variceal hemorrhage: a critical evaluation of survival analysis.静脉曲张出血:生存分析的批判性评估
Gastroenterology. 1982 May;82(5 Pt 1):968-73.
4
Distal splenorenal shunt vs. portal-systemic shunt: current status of a controlled trial.远端脾肾分流术与门体分流术:一项对照试验的现状
Hepatology. 1981 Mar-Apr;1(2):151-60. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840010211.
5
Results of a 12-year randomized trial of portacaval shunt in patients with alcoholic liver disease and bleeding varices.一项针对酒精性肝病合并静脉曲张出血患者进行的门腔分流术为期12年的随机试验结果。
Gastroenterology. 1981 May;80(5 pt 1):1005-11.
6
[Critical analysis of comparative therapeutic trials of elective portal shunts].[选择性门体分流术比较性治疗试验的批判性分析]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1980 Nov;4(11):804-11.
7
Pitfalls in randomized surgical trials.随机外科试验中的陷阱。
Surgery. 1980 Mar;87(3):258-62.
8
The Linton splenorenal shunt in the management of the bleeding complications of portal hypertension.林顿脾肾分流术在门静脉高压出血并发症治疗中的应用
Ann Surg. 1982 Dec;196(6):664-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198212001-00008.
9
Factors predicting survival after portosystemic shunt.预测门体分流术后生存的因素。
Am Surg. 1982 Jan;48(1):32-4.
10
Comparison of distal and proximal splenorenal shunts: a randomized prospective trial.远端与近端脾肾分流术的比较:一项随机前瞻性试验。
Ann Surg. 1981 Oct;194(4):531-44. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198110000-00016.