Suppr超能文献

疟疾与死亡率:一些流行病学考量

Malaria and mortality: some epidemiological considerations.

作者信息

Molineaux L

出版信息

Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1997 Oct;91(7):811-25. doi: 10.1080/00034989760572.

Abstract

Malaria can, a priori, kill on its own ('direct' malaria mortality) or in conjunction with some other cause(s) ('indirect' malaria mortality). There are three distinct approaches to the measurement of malaria mortality: (1) measurement of malaria-specific mortality (based on attributing each death to a single cause) or its surrogate, the admission rate for life-threatening malaria; (2) measurement of the reduction in all-cause mortality after removal (or near removal) of malaria; and (3) the estimation of the malaria mortality required to explain the observed frequency of the HbS gene. There is a strong indication that approaches (2) and (3) yield estimates of total (direct and indirect) malaria mortality which are at least twice as high as those obtained using approach (1), which probably measures mostly direct malaria mortality. There is currently a controversy about the long-term impact on mortality of reducing the intensity of malaria transmission from 'high' to 'intermediate', given the expected loss of immunity. Certain geographical comparisons (of the results of 'nature's experiment') indicate that, when the intensity of transmission is high, the incidence of life-threatening malaria falls. However, the seasonal variation in the intensity of transmission decreases with increases in the intensity; low seasonal variation is probably beneficial, allowing a smoother transition from passive to active immunity, but is unlikely to be reversed by preventive measures. It also seems likely that geographical comparisons produce estimates of predominantly direct mortality, which might not run in parallel with the indirect mortality. A tentative numerical exploration of the problem, using a simple demographic model, indicates that, if indirect malaria mortality is important and the other causes of death are concentrated in early life, the long-term impact on all-cause mortality of reducing exposure (although less than the short-term) will probably always be beneficial, even if there is some increase in direct malaria mortality.

摘要

疟疾可能会自行导致死亡(“直接”疟疾死亡率),也可能与其他一些原因共同导致死亡(“间接”疟疾死亡率)。测量疟疾死亡率有三种不同的方法:(1)测量疟疾特异性死亡率(基于将每例死亡归因于单一原因)或其替代指标,即危及生命的疟疾的住院率;(2)测量去除(或接近去除)疟疾后全因死亡率的降低情况;(3)估计解释观察到的 HbS 基因频率所需的疟疾死亡率。有强有力的迹象表明,方法(2)和(3)得出的总(直接和间接)疟疾死亡率估计值至少是使用方法(1)得出的估计值的两倍,方法(1)可能主要测量的是直接疟疾死亡率。鉴于预期的免疫力丧失,目前对于将疟疾传播强度从“高”降低到“中等”对死亡率的长期影响存在争议。某些地理比较(“自然实验”的结果)表明,当传播强度高时,危及生命的疟疾发病率会下降。然而,传播强度的季节性变化会随着强度的增加而减小;低季节性变化可能是有益的,它允许从被动免疫到主动免疫的平稳过渡,但不太可能通过预防措施得到逆转。地理比较得出的估计值似乎也主要是直接死亡率,这可能与间接死亡率并不平行。使用一个简单的人口模型对该问题进行的初步数值探索表明,如果间接疟疾死亡率很重要且其他死亡原因集中在生命早期,那么减少接触对全因死亡率的长期影响(尽管小于短期影响)可能总是有益的,即使直接疟疾死亡率有所增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验