Duplessis D H, Greenway E H, Keene K L, Lee I E, Clayton R L, Metzler T, Underwood F B
US Army-Baylor University Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, Medical Science Department, Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234-6138, USA.
Ergonomics. 1998 Jun;41(6):790-7. doi: 10.1080/001401398186649.
The use of back belts in industry has increased despite the lack of scientific evidence supporting their efficacy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a semi-rigid lumbosacral orthosis (SRLSO) on oxygen consumption during 6-min submaximal repetitive lifting bouts of 10 kg at a lifting frequency of 20 repetitions min-1. Fifteen healthy subjects (13 men, two women) participated in this study. Each subject performed squat and stoop lifting with and without an SRLSO for a total of four lifting bouts. Lifting bouts were performed in random order. Oxygen consumption during the final minute of each lifting bout was used for analysis. A two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to analyse the effects of lift and belt conditions. The stoop and squat methods were significantly different, with the squat lift requiring 23% more oxygen on average than the stoop lift for equal bouts of work. No significant difference was found between the belt and no belt condition within the same lifting technique and no interaction was present. These data suggest that an SRLSO does not passively assist the paravertebral muscles (PVM) in stabilizing the spine during submaximal lifting bouts.
尽管缺乏科学证据支持工业中使用背带来提高功效,但背带的使用仍在增加。本研究的目的是调查半刚性腰骶矫形器(SRLSO)对以每分钟20次的重复频率进行6分钟次最大重量(10千克)重复提举期间耗氧量的影响。15名健康受试者(13名男性,2名女性)参与了本研究。每位受试者在佩戴和不佩戴SRLSO的情况下进行深蹲和弯腰提举,共进行四轮提举。提举轮次随机进行。每轮提举最后一分钟的耗氧量用于分析。采用重复测量的双向方差分析来分析提举方式和佩戴背带情况的影响。深蹲和弯腰方式存在显著差异,在相同工作量的情况下,深蹲提举平均比弯腰提举多消耗23%的氧气。在相同的提举技术中,佩戴背带和不佩戴背带的情况之间没有发现显著差异,也不存在交互作用。这些数据表明,在次最大重量提举期间,SRLSO不能被动辅助椎旁肌(PVM)稳定脊柱。