Manyemba J
Department of Medicine, University of Zimbabwe Medical School, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Cent Afr J Med. 1997 Dec;43(12):344-9.
To compare the effectiveness of the combination of hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) plus sustained-release nifedipine with the combination of HCT plus reserpine in lowering high blood pressure (BP) unresponsive to HCT monotherapy.
An open, randomised crossover drug trial.
Outpatients' clinic in Parirenyatwa Hospital, Harare, a tertiary referral centre.
32 Black patients of both sexes with newly diagnosed or previously treated hypertension aged between 21 and 65 years who had a BP > 140/95 after receiving HCT 25 mg daily for four weeks were studied.
Patients were kept on HCT 25 mg daily and were randomised to receive either reserpine 0.25 mg daily or nifedipine (Adalat Retard) 20 mg bd for four weeks. This was followed by a two week washout period during which patients received HCT 25 mg daily only. After the washout period patients were crossed over to the alternative treatment for four weeks. Patients were kept on HCT 25 mg daily throughout the trial.
The main outcome measure was the fall in BP which was taken as the difference between the BP at baseline and the BP at the end of each treatment period. Both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measurements were taken.
Both second line drugs were effective in lowering SBP and DBP and there was no significant difference between them. Nifedipine reduced SBP by 18.9 mmHg (95% CI 12.1 to 25.7) and DBP by 9.6 mmHg (95% CI 7.2 to 12.0). Reserpine reduced SBP by 15.9 mmHg (95% CI 8.4 to 23.4) and DBP by 11.1 mmHg (95% CI 7.5 to 14.6). However, only two patients attained the target DBP of < or = 90 mmHg after each active treatment period.
Since both agents were equally effective in reducing both SBP and DBP and reserpine is much cheaper than nifedipine, it is recommended that for a developing country like Zimbabwe, the combination of HCT and reserpine at the above doses should be used as the first step to treat mild to moderate hypertension without evidence of end organ damage. However, further trials should compare BP lowering effects as well as end organ protection offered by the trial drugs.
比较氢氯噻嗪(HCT)加硝苯地平缓释片与HCT加利血平联合用药在降低对HCT单药治疗无反应的高血压(BP)方面的有效性。
一项开放、随机交叉药物试验。
位于哈拉雷的帕里伦亚瓦医院的门诊诊所,一家三级转诊中心。
32名年龄在21至65岁之间新诊断或曾接受治疗的高血压黑种人患者,在接受每日25毫克HCT治疗四周后血压>140/95。
患者继续每日服用25毫克HCT,并随机分为两组,一组每日服用0.25毫克利血平,另一组每日服用硝苯地平(拜新同缓释片)20毫克,分两次服用,为期四周。之后是为期两周的洗脱期,在此期间患者仅每日服用25毫克HCT。洗脱期结束后,患者交叉接受另一种治疗,为期四周。在整个试验过程中,患者持续每日服用25毫克HCT。
主要观察指标是血压下降情况,以基线血压与每个治疗期结束时的血压差值计算。同时测量收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)。
两种二线药物在降低SBP和DBP方面均有效,且二者之间无显著差异。硝苯地平使SBP降低18.9毫米汞柱(95%置信区间12.1至25.7),DBP降低9.6毫米汞柱(95%置信区间7.2至12.0)。利血平使SBP降低15.9毫米汞柱(95%置信区间8.4至23.4),DBP降低11.1毫米汞柱(95%置信区间7.5至14.6)。然而,在每个积极治疗期后,只有两名患者达到目标DBP≤90毫米汞柱。
由于两种药物在降低SBP和DBP方面同样有效,且利血平比硝苯地平便宜得多,因此建议对于像津巴布韦这样的发展中国家,上述剂量的HCT和利血平联合用药应作为治疗无终末器官损害证据的轻度至中度高血压的第一步。然而,进一步的试验应比较试验药物的降压效果以及对终末器官的保护作用。