Serpell J W, Pitcher M E
Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.
Aust N Z J Surg. 1998 May;68(5):345-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04769.x.
Soft-tissue sarcomas are rare, and clinical differentiation of benign tumours from sarcomas is sometimes impossible. Further, the diagnosis of soft-tissue sarcomas may be unsuspected pre-operatively, and the presenting mass enucleated. While enucleation (excisional biopsy) is acceptable for benign lesions, it is inappropriate for sarcomas, because the opportunity for the most effective management resulting in both adequate local control and functional limb salvage surgery is compromised. A high rate of wound complications following open incisional biopsy may also compromise local treatment. Inappropriate siting of the incision for both incisional and excisional biopsies may adversely affect subsequent surgery and radiotherapy.
We therefore assessed the accuracy of core biopsy in the diagnosis of soft-tissue tumours, and planning of definitive surgery. All patients with primary soft-tissue tumours managed by two surgeons with a special interest in soft-tissue sarcomas since 1991 were reviewed. More than half (53%) were referred from other specialists.
Of 45 cases, 37 (82%) were referred with the tumour intact, and of these 31 (84%) underwent core biopsy. The overall accuracy of core biopsy was 84%. The sensitivity was 94%, with 100% specificity. In most patients this allowed planning of definitive one-stage surgery (P < 0.005). Of the remaining five non-diagnostic cores, four were benign and one was a non-specific malignancy.
Core biopsy has a high degree of accuracy in the diagnosis of soft-tissue tumours, particularly malignant lesions, and is not misleading. Core biopsy avoids the complications of open biopsy, and enables planning of one-stage surgery when used in combination with appropriate imaging.
软组织肉瘤较为罕见,有时难以在临床上将良性肿瘤与肉瘤区分开来。此外,软组织肉瘤在术前可能未被怀疑,而送检的肿物可能已被摘除。虽然摘除术(切除活检)对于良性病变是可以接受的,但对于肉瘤并不合适,因为这会损害实现最有效治疗的机会,而这种治疗既能实现充分的局部控制,又能进行保留肢体功能的手术。开放切取活检后伤口并发症的发生率较高,也可能影响局部治疗。切取活检和切除活检的切口位置不当可能会对后续手术和放疗产生不利影响。
因此,我们评估了粗针活检在软组织肿瘤诊断及确定性手术规划中的准确性。回顾了自1991年以来由两位对软组织肉瘤有专门研究的外科医生治疗的所有原发性软组织肿瘤患者。超过一半(53%)的患者是由其他专科医生转诊而来。
45例患者中,37例(82%)转诊时肿瘤完整,其中31例(84%)接受了粗针活检。粗针活检的总体准确率为84%。敏感性为94%,特异性为100%。在大多数患者中,这使得能够规划确定性的一期手术(P<0.005)。其余5例非诊断性活检中,4例为良性,1例为非特异性恶性肿瘤。
粗针活检在软组织肿瘤尤其是恶性病变的诊断中具有高度准确性,且不会产生误导。粗针活检避免了开放活检的并发症,与适当的影像学检查联合使用时能够规划一期手术。