Suppr超能文献

文拉法辛一日一次与一日两次治疗重度抑郁症:一项随机双盲研究。

Once- versus twice-daily venlafaxine therapy in major depression: a randomized, double-blind study.

作者信息

Amsterdam J D, Hooper M B, Amchin J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 May;59(5):236-40. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v59n0506.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychotropic drug dosing regimens are often based on the pharmacokinetic elimination half-life of the compound. This implies that the pharmacokinetic half-life of the drug may be the critical or sole determinant of pharmacodynamic half-life. In the present study, we examined the safety and efficacy of once- versus twice-daily dosing regimens of the immediate-release formulation of venlafaxine, a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake site blocker with a short elimination half-life.

METHOD

Forty-eight patients with a diagnosis of DSM-IV major depressive episode were randomly assigned to once-daily (N = 25) versus twice-daily (N = 23) venlafaxine. Venlafaxine was started at 37.5 mg daily with specified increments up to 225 mg daily. Efficacy was rated using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI).

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients in each group completed 6 weeks of treatment. We observed a significant reduction in mean weekly HAM-D and MADRS scores at weeks 1 through 6 for both dosing groups (p < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in mean HAM-D or MADRS scores between dosing groups at any time point. There was, however, a nonsignificant trend for a more rapid reduction in the mean HAM-D score at week 2 (p < .06) and in the mean MADRS score at week 1 (p < .07) and week 2 (p < .09) in the b.i.d. dosing group. Similarly, there was a significant decrease in the CGI score at week 2 (p < .02) in the b.i.d. dosing group. The rate of adverse events was similar between treatment groups; the most common adverse events were transient nausea and headaches.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that the immediate-release formulation of venlafaxine may be safe and effective in some patients when used in a once-daily dose regimen. Moreover, the present results suggest that the short elimination half-life of immediate-release venlafaxine should not be the sole determinant for multiple daily dosing and that antidepressant activity may be more profoundly influenced by a drug's pharmacodynamic half-life than by its pharmacokinetic half-life.

摘要

背景

精神药物给药方案通常基于化合物的药代动力学消除半衰期。这意味着药物的药代动力学半衰期可能是药效学半衰期的关键或唯一决定因素。在本研究中,我们考察了文拉法辛速释制剂每日一次与每日两次给药方案的安全性和有效性,文拉法辛是一种具有短消除半衰期的5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取位点阻断剂。

方法

48例诊断为DSM-IV重度抑郁发作的患者被随机分配接受每日一次(N = 25)或每日两次(N = 23)的文拉法辛治疗。文拉法辛起始剂量为每日37.5mg,按规定增量至每日225mg。使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)和临床总体印象量表(CGI)评估疗效。

结果

每组21例患者完成了6周治疗。我们观察到两个给药组在第1至6周时平均每周HAM-D和MADRS评分均显著降低(p < .001)。在任何时间点,给药组之间的平均HAM-D或MADRS评分均无统计学显著差异。然而,每日两次给药组在第2周时平均HAM-D评分有更快降低的非显著趋势(p < .06),在第1周(p < .07)和第2周(p < .09)时平均MADRS评分也有此趋势。同样,每日两次给药组在第2周时CGI评分显著降低(p < .02)。治疗组之间不良事件发生率相似;最常见的不良事件是短暂性恶心和头痛。

结论

这些结果表明,文拉法辛速释制剂在一些患者中每日一次给药方案可能是安全有效的。此外,目前的结果表明,文拉法辛速释制剂短的消除半衰期不应是每日多次给药的唯一决定因素,并且抗抑郁活性可能受药物药效学半衰期的影响比受药代动力学半衰期的影响更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验