Ulrichsen J, Haugbøl S, Brandt C F, Allerup P, Hemmingsen R
Department of Psychiatry--6214, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alcohol Alcohol. 1998 May-Jun;33(3):230-43. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a008387.
In order to investigate whether alcohol-withdrawal kindling is an irreversible process, male Wistar rats were exposed to 12 episodes, each consisting of 2 days of severe alcohol intoxication and 5 days of alcohol withdrawal. Spontaneous withdrawal seizures were found in 15% of the animals during episodes 10-12. After an alcohol-free period of 26 days, the animals were subjected to three more episodes of alcohol dependence (i.e. episodes 13-15) in which 12% of the animals developed spontaneous withdrawal seizures. Based on several statistical tests, we concluded that there was no true difference between the seizure activity in episodes 10-12 and episodes 13-15, indicating that alcohol-withdrawal kindling is a long-lasting and perhaps irreversible process. In a second experiment, an alcohol-withdrawal kindled group was first exposed to seven episodes of alcohol dependence. A diazepam group went through the same alcohol regimen, but each withdrawal reaction was blocked by diazepam treatment. Finally, a single episode group was included which was fed isocalorically with the kindled animals. After an alcohol-free period of 11 days, all three groups were subjected to 4 days of severe alcohol intoxication. During the subsequent withdrawal reaction seizures were observed in 22-26% of the animals with no significant differences across the groups. These results call for a modification of the kindling hypothesis of alcohol withdrawal and suggest that kindling-induced alterations may be overlooked if convulsive behaviour is tested during a relatively strong withdrawal reaction.
为了研究酒精戒断点燃是否是一个不可逆的过程,将雄性Wistar大鼠暴露于12个阶段,每个阶段包括2天的严重酒精中毒和5天的酒精戒断。在第10 - 12阶段,15%的动物出现了自发性戒断惊厥。在26天的无酒精期后,对动物进行另外三个酒精依赖阶段(即第13 - 15阶段),其中12%的动物出现了自发性戒断惊厥。基于多项统计测试,我们得出结论,第10 - 12阶段和第13 - 15阶段的惊厥活动之间没有真正的差异,这表明酒精戒断点燃是一个持久的、也许是不可逆的过程。在第二个实验中,一个酒精戒断点燃组首先暴露于七个酒精依赖阶段。一个地西泮组经历相同的酒精方案,但每次戒断反应都用地西泮治疗进行阻断。最后,纳入一个单次暴露组,该组与点燃动物给予等热量饮食。在11天的无酒精期后,所有三组都经历了4天的严重酒精中毒。在随后的戒断反应期间,在22 - 26%的动物中观察到惊厥,各组之间没有显著差异。这些结果要求对酒精戒断的点燃假说进行修正,并表明如果在相对强烈的戒断反应期间测试惊厥行为,点燃诱导的改变可能会被忽视。