• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体拮抗剂与吗啡对大鼠辨别刺激效应之间的相互作用。

Interactions between N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists and the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in rats.

作者信息

Bespalov A Y, Beardsley P M, Balster R L

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298-0613, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1998 Jun;60(2):507-17. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(98)00006-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0091-3057(98)00006-9
PMID:9632234
Abstract

NMDA receptor antagonists have previously been reported to alter some pharmacological and behavioral effects of acute and chronic opioid administration. The present study assessed the interactions of NMDA antagonists with the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine. Adult male Long Evans rats were trained to discriminate 3.2 mg/kg of s.c. morphine from water under a two-lever fixed-ratio 10 schedule of food reinforcement. During test sessions. I.p. injections of the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist dizocilpine (0.03-0.2 mg/kg), the competitive antagonists NPC 17742 (1-16 mg/kg), and SDZ 220-581 (0.1-3 mg/kg), the polyamine site antagonist eliprodil (3-17.3 mg/kg), the glycine-site partial agonist (+)-HA-966 (3-56 mg/kg), and the nonselective glutamate antagonist kynurenic acid (30-150 mg/kg) were coadministered with s.c. morphine (1-3.2 mg/kg; interaction tests) or water (generalization tests). In generalization tests, none of the compounds completely substituted for morphine. Concurrent administration of morphine and NMDA antagonists did not greatly alter the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine. Various doses of NPC 17742, SDZ 220-581, or (+)-HA-966 somewhat increased levels of morphine-appropriate lever selection, whereas some attenuation of morphine-lever selection was obtained when morphine was coadministered with eliprodil. These results show that NMDA antagonists have minimal interactions with the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine.

摘要

此前有报道称,N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体拮抗剂可改变急性和慢性阿片类药物给药的一些药理和行为效应。本研究评估了NMDA拮抗剂与吗啡辨别刺激特性之间的相互作用。成年雄性Long Evans大鼠在双杠杆固定比率10食物强化程序下接受训练,以区分皮下注射3.2mg/kg吗啡和水。在测试期间,腹腔注射非竞争性NMDA受体拮抗剂地佐环平(0.03 - 0.2mg/kg)、竞争性拮抗剂NPC 17742(1 - 16mg/kg)和SDZ 220 - 581(0.1 - 3mg/kg)、多胺位点拮抗剂依利罗地(3 - 17.3mg/kg)、甘氨酸位点部分激动剂(+)-HA - 966(3 - 56mg/kg)以及非选择性谷氨酸拮抗剂犬尿喹啉酸(30 - 150mg/kg),并与皮下注射的吗啡(1 - 3.2mg/kg;相互作用测试)或水(泛化测试)同时给药。在泛化测试中,没有一种化合物能完全替代吗啡。吗啡与NMDA拮抗剂同时给药并没有显著改变吗啡的辨别刺激特性。不同剂量的NPC 17742、SDZ 220 - 581或(+)-HA - 966在一定程度上增加了选择与吗啡相应杠杆的水平,而当吗啡与依利罗地同时给药时,吗啡杠杆选择出现了一定程度的减弱。这些结果表明,NMDA拮抗剂与吗啡的辨别刺激效应之间的相互作用最小。

相似文献

1
Interactions between N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists and the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in rats.N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体拮抗剂与吗啡对大鼠辨别刺激效应之间的相互作用。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1998 Jun;60(2):507-17. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(98)00006-9.
2
N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists and the development of tolerance to the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in rats.N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体拮抗剂与大鼠对吗啡辨别刺激效应的耐受性发展
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999 Jul;290(1):20-7.
3
Pharmacological specificity of the discriminative stimulus properties of 2-amino-4,5-(1,2-cyclohexyl)-7-phosphono-heptanoic acid (NPC 12626), a competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist.2-氨基-4,5-(1,2-环己基)-7-膦酰基庚酸(NPC 12626,一种竞争性N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体拮抗剂)鉴别刺激特性的药理特异性
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993 Feb;264(2):845-53.
4
N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4- isoxazoleproprionate (AMPA) glutamate-receptor antagonists have different interactions with the discriminative stimuli of abused drugs.N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)和α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸(AMPA)谷氨酸受体拮抗剂与滥用药物的辨别性刺激有不同的相互作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Dec;128(3):320-7. doi: 10.1007/s002130050140.
5
Effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists on discriminative stimulus effects of naloxone in morphine-dependent rats using the Y-maze drug discrimination paradigm.使用Y迷宫药物辨别范式研究N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体拮抗剂对吗啡依赖大鼠中纳洛酮辨别刺激效应的影响。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998 Sep;286(3):1260-8.
6
Discriminative stimulus effects of site-selective N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists in NPC 17742-trained rats and squirrel monkeys.位点选择性N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸拮抗剂在经NPC 17742训练的大鼠和松鼠猴中的辨别性刺激效应。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1997 Aug;132(4):382-8. doi: 10.1007/s002130050359.
7
Discriminative stimulus effects of the NMDA receptor antagonists MK-801 and CGP 37849 in rats.NMDA受体拮抗剂MK-801和CGP 37849对大鼠的辨别性刺激作用。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1996 Sep;55(1):163-8. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(95)02290-2.
8
Modulation of the discriminative stimulus and rate-altering effects of cocaine by competitive and noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists.竞争性和非竞争性N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸拮抗剂对可卡因辨别刺激和速率改变效应的调节作用。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1998 Jan;59(1):159-69. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(97)00379-1.
9
Drug discrimination analysis of NMDA receptor channel blockers as nicotinic receptor antagonists in rats.大鼠中作为烟碱样受体拮抗剂的NMDA受体通道阻滞剂的药物辨别分析
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Apr;179(1):128-35. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-2067-4. Epub 2005 Jan 29.
10
Ethanol enhances naloxone sensitization and disrupts morphine discrimination--comparison to dizocilpine and pentobarbital: explanation of enhancing acute and attenuating chronic effects.乙醇增强纳洛酮敏感性并破坏吗啡辨别能力——与地佐环平及戊巴比妥的比较:急性增强及慢性减弱效应的解释
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;25(6):1283-306. doi: 10.1016/s0278-5846(01)00180-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Glutamatergic substrates of drug addiction and alcoholism.药物成瘾和酒精中毒的谷氨酸能底物。
Biochem Pharmacol. 2008 Jan 1;75(1):218-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.06.039. Epub 2007 Jun 30.
2
Drug discrimination analysis of NMDA receptor channel blockers as nicotinic receptor antagonists in rats.大鼠中作为烟碱样受体拮抗剂的NMDA受体通道阻滞剂的药物辨别分析
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Apr;179(1):128-35. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-2067-4. Epub 2005 Jan 29.