• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寻找与线性层次结构最一致的优势顺序:一种新方法及综述。

Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: a new procedure and review.

作者信息

de VRIES

机构信息

Ethology & Socio-ecology Group, Utrecht University

出版信息

Anim Behav. 1998 Apr;55(4):827-43. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0708.

DOI:10.1006/anbe.1997.0708
PMID:9632471
Abstract

A procedure for ordering a set of individuals into a linear or near-linear dominance hierarchy is presented. Two criteria are used in a prioritized way in reorganizing the dominance matrix to find an order that is most consistent with a linear hierarchy: first, minimization of the numbers of inconsistencies and, second, minimization of the total strength of the inconsistencies. The linear ordering procedure, which involves an iterative algorithm based on a generalized swapping rule, is feasible for matrices of up to 80 individuals. The procedure can be applied to any dominance matrix, since it does not make any assumptions about the form of the probabilities of winning and losing. The only assumption is the existence of a linear or near-linear hierarchy which can be verified by means of a linearity test. A review of existing ranking methods is presented and these are compared with the proposed method. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

摘要

本文提出了一种将一组个体排列成线性或近似线性优势等级的程序。在重新组织优势矩阵以找到与线性等级最一致的顺序时,以优先顺序使用了两个标准:第一,将不一致的数量最小化;第二,将不一致的总强度最小化。线性排序程序涉及基于广义交换规则的迭代算法,对于多达80个个体的矩阵是可行的。该程序可以应用于任何优势矩阵,因为它对输赢概率的形式不做任何假设。唯一的假设是存在线性或近似线性等级,这可以通过线性测试来验证。本文对现有的排序方法进行了综述,并将它们与所提出的方法进行了比较。版权所有1998动物行为研究协会。版权所有1998动物行为研究协会。

相似文献

1
Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: a new procedure and review.寻找与线性层次结构最一致的优势顺序:一种新方法及综述。
Anim Behav. 1998 Apr;55(4):827-43. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0708.
2
Finding an appropriate order for a hierarchy based on probabilistic dominance.基于概率优势找到层次结构的合适顺序。
Anim Behav. 1999 May;57(5):991-998. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1077.
3
The making of winners (and losers): how early dominance interactions determine adult social structure in a clonal fish.胜者(与败者)的形成:早期优势互动如何决定一种克隆鱼的成年社会结构。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 May 11;283(1830). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0183.
4
Reevaluation of dominance hierarchy in bonobos (Pan paniscus).倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)优势等级制度的重新评估。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 May;130(1):116-22. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20345.
5
Using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to visualize and test the linearity assumption of the Bradley-Terry class of models.使用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)方法来可视化并检验布拉德利-特里模型类别的线性假设。
Anim Behav. 2012 Dec 1;84(6):1523-1531. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.09.026.
6
Effect of unknown relationships on linearity, steepness and rank ordering of dominance hierarchies: simulation studies based on data from wild monkeys.未知关系对优势等级线性、陡度和排序的影响:基于野生猴子数据的模拟研究
Behav Processes. 2011 Nov;88(3):168-76. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
7
Ritualized conflict in Odontomachus brunneus and the generation of interaction-based task allocation: a new organizational mechanism in ants.布氏猛蚁的仪式化冲突与基于互动的任务分配的产生:蚂蚁的一种新组织机制
Anim Behav. 1999 Nov;58(5):965-972. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1238.
8
Systemic testing on Bradley-Terry model against nonlinear ranking hierarchy.针对非线性排序层次结构对布拉德利-特里模型进行系统测试。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 22;9(12):e115367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115367. eCollection 2014.
9
Peering is not a formal indicator of subordination in bonobos (Pan paniscus).在倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)中,凝视并不是从属地位的正式标志。
Am J Primatol. 2005 Mar;65(3):255-67. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20113.
10
A Game-Theoretical Winner and Loser Model of Dominance Hierarchy Formation.一种支配等级制度形成的博弈论赢家与输家模型。
Bull Math Biol. 2016 Jun;78(6):1259-90. doi: 10.1007/s11538-016-0186-9. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Turn-taking in grooming interactions of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the wild: the role of demographic and social factors.野生黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii)梳理毛发互动中的轮流行为:人口统计学和社会因素的作用。
Anim Cogn. 2025 Mar 24;28(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01940-7.
2
Social play in African savannah elephants may inform selection against aggression.非洲草原象的社交行为可能有助于选择抑制攻击性。
Curr Zool. 2024 Mar 11;70(6):765-779. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoae009. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Hierarchies inferred from different agonistic behaviours are not always comparable.
从不同争斗行为推断出的等级制度并不总是具有可比性。
J Anim Ecol. 2024 Dec;93(12):1947-1959. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.14203. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
4
Male-biased dominance in greater bamboo lemurs ().大竹狐猴中雄性占主导地位()。 (注:原文括号内内容缺失,所以译文括号处也保留原样)
Primate Biol. 2024 Mar 28;11(1):13-17. doi: 10.5194/pb-11-13-2024. eCollection 2024.
5
Role of immigrant males and muzzle contacts in the uptake of a novel food by wild vervet monkeys.移民雄性和口鼻接触在野生豚尾猴接受新型食物中的作用。
Elife. 2024 Jan 9;13:e76486. doi: 10.7554/eLife.76486.
6
Evidence suggesting that reindeer mothers allonurse according to the direct reciprocity and generalized reciprocity decision rules.有证据表明,驯鹿母亲根据直接互惠和广义互惠决策规则进行全哺乳。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 14;18(12):e0295497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295497. eCollection 2023.
7
Implications of dominance hierarchy on hummingbird-plant interactions in a temperate forest in Northwestern Mexico.优势等级制度对墨西哥西北部温带森林中蜂鸟与植物相互作用的影响。
PeerJ. 2023 Oct 17;11:e16245. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16245. eCollection 2023.
8
Testing the Challenge Hypothesis in Stumptail Macaque Males: The Role of Testosterone and Glucocorticoid Metabolites in Aggressive and Mating Behavior.在短尾猕猴雄性中检验挑战假说:睾酮和糖皮质激素代谢产物在攻击行为和交配行为中的作用
Biology (Basel). 2023 Jun 3;12(6):813. doi: 10.3390/biology12060813.
9
Social network inheritance and differentiation in wild baboons.野生狒狒的社交网络传承与分化
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 May 24;10(5):230219. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230219. eCollection 2023 May.
10
Social Reward Behaviour in Two Groups of European Grey Wolves ()-A Case Study.两组欧洲灰狼的社会奖励行为()——一项案例研究
Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 27;13(5):872. doi: 10.3390/ani13050872.