Suppr超能文献

一项针对初次肿瘤细胞减灭术达到最佳效果的Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ期卵巢癌患者进行两剂腹盆腔放射治疗的随机研究。

A randomized study of two doses of abdominopelvic radiation therapy for patients with optimally debulked Stage I, II, and III ovarian cancer.

作者信息

Fyles A W, Thomas G M, Pintilie M, Ackerman I, Levin W

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jun 1;41(3):543-9. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00066-2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether an increased dose of abdominal radiation therapy results in improved disease control and survival in patients with early ovarian cancer.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

Between 1981 and 1990, 125 patients with optimally debulked Stage I, II, and III ovarian cancer were entered into a prospective randomized clinical trial of abdominopelvic radiation therapy. Patients were stratified and randomized to either the control arm, treated with an abdominal dose of 22.5 Gy in 22 fractions, or the experimental arm of 27.5 Gy in 27 fractions. A pelvic boost dose of 22.5 Gy was used in both arms. There were 43 patients with Stage I tumors, 71 Stage II tumors, and 11 Stage III tumors. Nineteen patients had grade 1 histology, 77 grade 2, and 29 grade 3. Three patients had small-volume residual disease (<2 cm) in the pelvis alone and the remainder had no gross tumor following surgery. Median follow-up was 6.6 years (range 1.4-9.9).

RESULTS

Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 83% in the low-dose arm and 72% in the high-dose arm (p = 0.3). Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was 74% and 67% in the low-dose and high-dose arms, respectively (p = 0.5). The difference in OS between the two arms was -11%, with 95% confidence intervals of -26% (favoring low-dose treatment) to 4% (in favor of high dose). The difference in DFS was -7% (95% confidence interval, -23 to 9%). Failure in the pelvis alone predominated (n = 15); six patients had abdominal and pelvic failure and seven patients failed in the abdomen alone. There were no differences in patterns of relapse, hematologic toxicity, or late complications between the two arms. Serious bowel toxicity was seen in three patients: two in the low-dose and one in the high-dose arm. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the effect of treatment when adjusting for other prognostic variables. Ascites (p = 0.03, relative risk 2.05) was the only significant covariate in predicting disease-free survival, but was not prognostic for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in survival, tumor control, or toxicity between high-dose and low-dose abdominopelvic radiation therapy. High-dose abdominopelvic radiation therapy is unlikely to be associated with an increase in OS of more than 4% or DFS of more than 9%.

摘要

目的

确定增加腹部放射治疗剂量是否能改善早期卵巢癌患者的疾病控制情况及生存率。

方法与患者

1981年至1990年间,125例接受了最佳肿瘤细胞减灭术的Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ期卵巢癌患者进入了一项关于腹盆腔放射治疗的前瞻性随机临床试验。患者被分层并随机分配至对照组,接受22次分割共22.5 Gy的腹部照射剂量,或试验组,接受27次分割共27.5 Gy的腹部照射剂量。两组均使用22.5 Gy的盆腔追加剂量。有43例Ⅰ期肿瘤患者,71例Ⅱ期肿瘤患者和11例Ⅲ期肿瘤患者。19例患者为1级组织学类型,77例为2级,29例为3级。3例患者仅盆腔有小体积残留病灶(<2 cm),其余患者术后无肉眼可见肿瘤。中位随访时间为6.6年(范围1.4 - 9.9年)。

结果

低剂量组5年总生存率(OS)为83%,高剂量组为72%(p = 0.3)。低剂量组和高剂量组5年无病生存率(DFS)分别为74%和67%(p = 0.5)。两组间OS差异为-11%,95%置信区间为-26%(支持低剂量治疗)至4%(支持高剂量)。DFS差异为-7%(95%置信区间,-23%至9%)。仅盆腔复发占主导(n = 15);6例患者出现腹部和盆腔复发,7例患者仅腹部复发。两组在复发模式、血液学毒性或晚期并发症方面无差异。3例患者出现严重肠道毒性:低剂量组2例,高剂量组1例。使用Cox比例风险模型在调整其他预后变量时评估治疗效果。腹水(p = 0.03,相对风险2.05)是预测无病生存的唯一显著协变量,但对总生存无预后价值。

结论

高剂量和低剂量腹盆腔放射治疗在生存、肿瘤控制或毒性方面无差异。高剂量腹盆腔放射治疗不太可能使总生存率提高超过4%或无病生存率提高超过9%。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验