Shaw D J, Vercruysse J, Claerebout E, Dorny P
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Gent, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Vet Parasitol. 1998 Feb 28;75(2-3):115-31. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(97)00214-8.
Research on the prevention of gastrointestinal nematode infections of cattle has mainly concentrated on comparing a specific chemoprophylactic treatment system to an untreated control group on a particular farm. Here, the results from analysis of 85 studies involving over 2000 first grazing season (FGS) calves put onto pasture for at least 4 months from late spring/early summer over a 26-year period in 13 countries in Western Europe are presented. Both control and chemoprophylactic treated FGS calf groups were considered. All chemoprophylactic systems (slow- and pulse-release boli, strategic treatments) were given early in the grazing season. Two general infection levels emerged--'sub-clinical' (32 studies) and 'clinical' (53 studies). The 'sub-clinical' infections were characterised by no clinical symptoms of parasitic gastroenteritis (PGE) being observed in the control groups. Mean faecal egg counts in the 'clinical' control groups were significantly higher than those for 'sub-clinical' control groups for almost the entire season with overall peaks of 275 and 100 EPG respectively. Maximum pasture larval counts were also significantly higher in the 'clinical' control groups with 44% of 'clinical' pastures > 10,000 L3 kg(-1) dry herbage by the end of the FGS, compared to only 15% of 'sub-clinical' pastures. There was a significant positive relationship between log transformed worm burdens from tracers put onto pastures for 2 weeks and the corresponding pasture larval count. No evidence of density dependence in tracer worm burden was observed. Weight gains in the 'clinical' control groups (375 g/day) were significantly lower than those of the 'sub-clinical' control groups (530 g/day). No symptoms of PGE were observed in any of the chemoprophylactic treated groups, but in those studies with an outbreak of PGE in the control group, the treated groups had significantly higher faecal egg and pasture larval counts than treated groups in 'sub-clinical' studies. The overall weight gain in chemoprophylactic treated calves in 'clinical' studies (600 g/day) was significantly lower than the chemoprophylactic treated calves in 'sub-clinical' studies (690 g/day), and was not significantly different from the weight gain of control calves in 'sub-clinical' studies. These results indicate that on heavily infected pastures, chemoprophylaxis will prevent PGE, but calves will still suffer production losses.
牛胃肠道线虫感染预防的研究主要集中在将特定的化学预防治疗体系与特定农场的未治疗对照组进行比较。本文呈现了对85项研究结果的分析,这些研究涉及2000多头处于首个放牧季节(FGS)的犊牛,在26年期间,于西欧13个国家从春末/夏初开始在牧场放牧至少4个月。研究考虑了对照组和接受化学预防治疗的FGS犊牛组。所有化学预防体系(缓释和脉冲释放丸剂、策略性治疗)均在放牧季节早期施用。出现了两种一般感染水平——“亚临床”(32项研究)和“临床”(53项研究)。“亚临床”感染的特征是对照组未观察到寄生性胃肠炎(PGE)的临床症状。在几乎整个季节中,“临床”对照组的平均粪检虫卵数显著高于“亚临床”对照组,总体峰值分别为275和100个虫卵/克粪便(EPG)。“临床”对照组的最大牧场幼虫数也显著更高,到FGS结束时,44%的“临床”牧场每千克干牧草的第三期幼虫(L3)>10,000条,而“亚临床”牧场仅为15%。在牧场上放置两周的示踪动物的对数转换后虫负荷与相应的牧场幼虫数之间存在显著的正相关关系。未观察到示踪动物虫负荷的密度依赖性证据。“临床”对照组的体重增加(375克/天)显著低于“亚临床”对照组(530克/天)。在任何接受化学预防治疗的组中均未观察到PGE症状,但在对照组发生PGE疫情的那些研究中,治疗组的粪检虫卵数和牧场幼虫数显著高于“亚临床”研究中的治疗组。“临床”研究中接受化学预防治疗的犊牛的总体体重增加(600克/天)显著低于“亚临床”研究中接受化学预防治疗的犊牛(690克/天),且与“亚临床”研究中对照组犊牛的体重增加无显著差异。这些结果表明,在重度感染的牧场上,化学预防可预防PGE,但犊牛仍会遭受生产损失。