Dutoit M
Hôpital Orthopédique de la Suisse Romande, Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 1998 May-Jun;37(3):199-203. doi: 10.1016/s1067-2516(98)80111-7.
The purpose of this retrospective study is to report the author's experience with talocalcaneal bar resections in eight young patients, mean age 14.1 years, with a mean follow-up of 54 months (range, 36-136 months). All patients were submitted before surgery to conservative treatment during 20.3 months (range, 6-60 months) which consisted of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication, physical therapy, short waves, and insoles. At follow-up, no recurrence and no secondary deformity of the foot were observed. Four patients were totally pain free with no restriction of activity, two patients had some pain during sport exercises, and one patient with bilateral involvement had pain after strenuous activities. The study evaluated the mobility of the subtalar joint at follow-up by comparing it with the healthy side. A total restoration of mobility was observed in four patients, partial in three, and limited residual mobility was observed in only one patient. Talocalcaneal bar resection is the treatment of choice in young patients after failure of conservative measures. In this population, there is no place for subtalar joint arthrodesis.
这项回顾性研究的目的是报告作者对8名平均年龄14.1岁的年轻患者进行距跟骨桥切除术的经验,平均随访54个月(范围36 - 136个月)。所有患者在手术前均接受了20.3个月(范围6 - 60个月)的保守治疗,包括非甾体类抗炎药、物理治疗、短波治疗和鞋垫。随访时,未观察到足部复发和继发畸形。4例患者完全无痛,活动无受限,2例患者在体育锻炼时有一些疼痛,1例双侧受累患者在剧烈活动后疼痛。该研究通过与健康侧比较来评估随访时距下关节的活动度。4例患者活动度完全恢复,3例部分恢复,仅1例患者残留有限的活动度。距跟骨桥切除术是保守治疗失败后年轻患者的首选治疗方法。在这个人群中,距下关节融合术没有用武之地。