• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用磁体和超弹性线圈进行二类错颌矫治,随后进行直丝弓机械治疗。牙科治疗期间及之后的咬合变化。

Class II correction with magnets and superelastic coils followed by straight-wire mechanotherapy. Occlusal changes during and after dental therapy.

作者信息

Bondemark L, Kurol J

机构信息

Orthodontic Clinic, Hässleholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Orofac Orthop. 1998;59(3):127-38. doi: 10.1007/BF01317174.

DOI:10.1007/BF01317174
PMID:9639999
Abstract

The investigation comprised 18 consecutively selected patients, mean age 14.7 years at the start of treatment, with Class II malocclusion, deep overbite and space deficiency in the maxillary arch. The first phase of the treatment consisted of 6 months simultaneous distal movement of maxillary first and second molars with repelling samarium-cobalt magnets on one side and a superelastic nickel-titanium coil on the contralateral side together with an anterior biteplane to achieve bite opening. For the second phase of the treatment, a straight-wire appliance was used for an average treatment time of 1.3 years. Lateral head radiographs and dental casts were available at the start of treatment, after molar distalisation, at the end of treatment and 1 year post-treatment. The treatment resulted mainly in dental changes. The dental Class II molar relation was corrected to Class I by bodily distal movement of maxillary molars and by mesial movement of the mandibular molars. The correction of molar relation was significantly greater on coil sides than on magnet sides, mean 3.4 mm, and 3.0 mm, respectively. Despite anchorage loss associated with the maxillary molar movement, i.e. mesial movement of the maxillary incisors (mean 1.8 mm), the net overjet was reduced, mean 2.5 mm, by the use of Class II elastics. The average net improvement of bite opening was 2.6 mm, mainly due to extrusion of mandibular and maxillary molars. During the 1-year post-treatment period no significant dental or skeletal changes were found. The long-term implications of the treatment results need further consideration.

摘要

该研究纳入了18例连续入选的患者,治疗开始时平均年龄为14.7岁,均为安氏II类错牙合、深覆牙合且上颌牙弓存在间隙不足。治疗的第一阶段为期6个月,通过一侧使用斥力钐钴磁体、另一侧使用超弹性镍钛螺旋弹簧同时远移上颌第一和第二磨牙,并配合前牙平面导板以打开咬合。治疗的第二阶段使用直丝弓矫治器,平均治疗时间为1.3年。在治疗开始时、磨牙远移后、治疗结束时以及治疗后1年均获取了头颅侧位片和牙模型。治疗主要导致了牙齿的变化。通过上颌磨牙的整体远移和下颌磨牙的近移,将安氏II类磨牙关系矫正为安氏I类。螺旋弹簧侧的磨牙关系矫正显著大于磁体侧,分别平均为3.4 mm和3.0 mm。尽管上颌磨牙远移导致了支抗丧失,即上颌切牙近移(平均1.8 mm),但通过使用II类牵引,平均减少了2.5 mm的覆盖。咬合打开的平均净改善量为2.6 mm,主要是由于下颌和上颌磨牙的伸长。在治疗后1年期间,未发现明显的牙齿或骨骼变化。治疗结果的长期影响需要进一步考虑。

相似文献

1
Class II correction with magnets and superelastic coils followed by straight-wire mechanotherapy. Occlusal changes during and after dental therapy.使用磁体和超弹性线圈进行二类错颌矫治,随后进行直丝弓机械治疗。牙科治疗期间及之后的咬合变化。
J Orofac Orthop. 1998;59(3):127-38. doi: 10.1007/BF01317174.
2
Repelling magnets versus superelastic nickel-titanium coils in simultaneous distal movement of maxillary first and second molars.在上颌第一和第二磨牙同时远中移动中,排斥磁体与超弹性镍钛线圈的比较
Angle Orthod. 1994;64(3):189-98. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0189:RMVSNC>2.0.CO;2.
3
A comparative analysis of distal maxillary molar movement produced by a new lingual intra-arch Ni-Ti coil appliance and a magnetic appliance.新型舌侧弓内镍钛螺旋弹簧矫治器与磁力矫治器在上颌远中磨牙移动方面的对比分析
Eur J Orthod. 2000 Dec;22(6):683-95. doi: 10.1093/ejo/22.6.683.
4
Orthodontic magnets. A study of force and field pattern, biocompatibility and clinical effects.正畸磁体。力与场模式、生物相容性及临床效果的研究。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 1994;99:1-148.
5
Severe unilateral scissors-bite with a constricted mandibular arch: Bite turbos and extra-alveolar bone screws in the infrazygomatic crests and mandibular buccal shelf.严重单侧交叉𬌗伴下颌弓狭窄:在下颌颧突和下颌颊棚施以𬌗垫和牙槽外骨钉。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Oct;154(4):554-569. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.032.
6
Maxillary unilateral molar distalization with sliding mechanics: a preliminary investigation.采用滑动机制进行上颌单侧磨牙远中移动:一项初步研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2001 Oct;23(5):507-15. doi: 10.1093/ejo/23.5.507.
7
Intraoral maxillary molar distalization.口内上颌磨牙远中移动
Angle Orthod. 2006 Nov;76(6):923-9. doi: 10.2319/110805-390.
8
A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: intraoral bodily molar distalizer.上颌磨牙远移的一种新方法:口内整体磨牙远移器
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Jan;117(1):39-48. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70246-0.
9
Extraoral vs intraoral appliance for distal movement of maxillary first molars: a randomized controlled trial.用于上颌第一磨牙远中移动的口外矫治器与口内矫治器:一项随机对照试验
Angle Orthod. 2005 Sep;75(5):699-706. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[699:EVIAFD]2.0.CO;2.
10
Anchorage provided during intra-arch distal molar movement: a comparison between the Nance appliance and a fixed frontal bite plane.牙弓内远中磨牙移动过程中的支抗提供:Nance矫治器与固定前牙咬合平面的比较
Angle Orthod. 2005 May;75(3):437-43. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[437:APDIDM]2.0.CO;2.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictability of Dental Distalization with Clear Aligners: A Systematic Review.使用透明矫治器进行牙齿远中移动的可预测性:一项系统评价。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Dec 4;10(12):1390. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10121390.
2
Stability of deep-bite correction: A systematic review.深覆合矫治的稳定性:一项系统评价。
J World Fed Orthod. 2012 Sep 1;1(3):e89-e86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2012.09.001.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of fixed anterior biteplane therapy--a radiographic study.固定前牙咬合板治疗的效果——一项影像学研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Jul;110(1):61-8. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70088-4.
2
Repelling magnets versus superelastic nickel-titanium coils in simultaneous distal movement of maxillary first and second molars.在上颌第一和第二磨牙同时远中移动中,排斥磁体与超弹性镍钛线圈的比较
Angle Orthod. 1994;64(3):189-98. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0189:RMVSNC>2.0.CO;2.
3
Skeletal and dental changes associated with the treatment of deep bite malocclusion.
与深覆合错牙合治疗相关的骨骼和牙齿变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Apr;107(4):382-93. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70091-9.
4
Case reports: molar distalization with static repelling magnets. Part II.病例报告:使用静态排斥磁体进行磨牙远中移动。第二部分。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Nov;108(5):547-55. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70056-0.
5
The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.Herbst矫治器治疗中二类错颌矫治机制的头影测量研究
Am J Orthod. 1982 Aug;82(2):104-13. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90489-4.
6
The effect of a lingual arch appliance with anterior bite plane in deep overbite correction.
Eur J Orthod. 1984 May;6(2):107-15. doi: 10.1093/ejo/6.2.107.
7
The super-elastic Japanese NiTi alloy wire for use in orthodontics. Part III. Studies on the Japanese NiTi alloy coil springs.用于正畸的超弹性日本镍钛合金丝。第三部分。日本镍钛合金螺旋弹簧的研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Aug;94(2):89-96. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90356-3.
8
The use of magnets to move molars distally.使用磁铁使磨牙向远中移动。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Aug;96(2):161-7. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90257-6.
9
Japanese NiTi coils used to move molars distally.用于将磨牙向远中移动的日本镍钛线圈。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Jun;99(6):564-6. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81633-6.
10
Rare earth magnets and impaction.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Dec;100(6):494-512. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(08)80004-2.