Bondemark L, Kurol J
Orthodontic Clinic, Hässleholm, Sweden.
J Orofac Orthop. 1998;59(3):127-38. doi: 10.1007/BF01317174.
The investigation comprised 18 consecutively selected patients, mean age 14.7 years at the start of treatment, with Class II malocclusion, deep overbite and space deficiency in the maxillary arch. The first phase of the treatment consisted of 6 months simultaneous distal movement of maxillary first and second molars with repelling samarium-cobalt magnets on one side and a superelastic nickel-titanium coil on the contralateral side together with an anterior biteplane to achieve bite opening. For the second phase of the treatment, a straight-wire appliance was used for an average treatment time of 1.3 years. Lateral head radiographs and dental casts were available at the start of treatment, after molar distalisation, at the end of treatment and 1 year post-treatment. The treatment resulted mainly in dental changes. The dental Class II molar relation was corrected to Class I by bodily distal movement of maxillary molars and by mesial movement of the mandibular molars. The correction of molar relation was significantly greater on coil sides than on magnet sides, mean 3.4 mm, and 3.0 mm, respectively. Despite anchorage loss associated with the maxillary molar movement, i.e. mesial movement of the maxillary incisors (mean 1.8 mm), the net overjet was reduced, mean 2.5 mm, by the use of Class II elastics. The average net improvement of bite opening was 2.6 mm, mainly due to extrusion of mandibular and maxillary molars. During the 1-year post-treatment period no significant dental or skeletal changes were found. The long-term implications of the treatment results need further consideration.
该研究纳入了18例连续入选的患者,治疗开始时平均年龄为14.7岁,均为安氏II类错牙合、深覆牙合且上颌牙弓存在间隙不足。治疗的第一阶段为期6个月,通过一侧使用斥力钐钴磁体、另一侧使用超弹性镍钛螺旋弹簧同时远移上颌第一和第二磨牙,并配合前牙平面导板以打开咬合。治疗的第二阶段使用直丝弓矫治器,平均治疗时间为1.3年。在治疗开始时、磨牙远移后、治疗结束时以及治疗后1年均获取了头颅侧位片和牙模型。治疗主要导致了牙齿的变化。通过上颌磨牙的整体远移和下颌磨牙的近移,将安氏II类磨牙关系矫正为安氏I类。螺旋弹簧侧的磨牙关系矫正显著大于磁体侧,分别平均为3.4 mm和3.0 mm。尽管上颌磨牙远移导致了支抗丧失,即上颌切牙近移(平均1.8 mm),但通过使用II类牵引,平均减少了2.5 mm的覆盖。咬合打开的平均净改善量为2.6 mm,主要是由于下颌和上颌磨牙的伸长。在治疗后1年期间,未发现明显的牙齿或骨骼变化。治疗结果的长期影响需要进一步考虑。