• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体差异与童年虚假记忆的形成

Individual differences and the creation of false childhood memories.

作者信息

Hyman I E, Billings F J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Western Washington University, Bellingham 98225, USA.

出版信息

Memory. 1998 Jan;6(1):1-20. doi: 10.1080/741941598.

DOI:10.1080/741941598
PMID:9640430
Abstract

We investigated if college students will create false childhood memories, the role of self-knowledge in memory creation, and if there are reliable individual differences related to memory creation. Based on information obtained from parents, we asked college students about several true childhood experiences. We also asked each student about one false event and presented the false event as if it was based on parent information. We asked the students to describe all events in two interviews separated by one day. When participants could not recall an event (whether true or false), we encouraged them to think about related self-knowledge and to try to imagine the event. In an unrelated experimental session, the students were administered four cognitive/personality scales: the Creative Imagination Scale (CIS), the Tellegen Absorption Scale (TAS), the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES), and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (SDS). We found that approximately 25% of the students created false childhood memories. Participants who made connections to related self-knowledge in the first interview were more likely to create false memories. We also found that the CIS and the DES were positively related to memory creation. Factors that decrease one's ability to engage in reality monitoring are related to the acceptance of false events and the creation of false memories.

摘要

我们研究了大学生是否会创造虚假的童年记忆、自我认知在记忆创造中的作用,以及是否存在与记忆创造相关的可靠个体差异。根据从父母那里获得的信息,我们询问大学生一些真实的童年经历。我们还询问了每个学生一件虚假事件,并将该虚假事件呈现为好像是基于父母提供的信息。我们要求学生在相隔一天的两次访谈中描述所有事件。当参与者无法回忆起某个事件(无论真假)时,我们鼓励他们思考相关的自我认知并尝试想象该事件。在一个不相关的实验环节中,给学生们进行了四项认知/人格量表测试:创造性想象量表(CIS)、特根吸收量表(TAS)、解离体验量表(DES)和马洛-克劳恩社会赞许性量表(SDS)。我们发现约25%的学生创造了虚假的童年记忆。在第一次访谈中能将相关自我认知联系起来的参与者更有可能创造虚假记忆。我们还发现CIS和DES与记忆创造呈正相关。降低一个人进行现实监控能力的因素与接受虚假事件和创造虚假记忆有关。

相似文献

1
Individual differences and the creation of false childhood memories.个体差异与童年虚假记忆的形成
Memory. 1998 Jan;6(1):1-20. doi: 10.1080/741941598.
2
Creating false memories for events that occurred before versus after the offset of childhood amnesia.为童年失忆症消退之前与之后发生的事件制造错误记忆。
Memory. 2008;16(5):475-84. doi: 10.1080/09658210802059049.
3
Emotional content of true and false memories.真实记忆与虚假记忆的情感内容。
Memory. 2008;16(5):500-16. doi: 10.1080/09658210802065939.
4
False reports of childhood events in appropriate interviews.在适当访谈中关于童年事件的虚假报告。
Memory. 2005 Oct;13(7):700-10. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000340.
5
Memory for media: investigation of false memories for negatively and positively charged public events.对媒体事件的记忆:对带有负面和正面色彩的公共事件的错误记忆研究
Memory. 2008;16(6):658-66. doi: 10.1080/09658210802154626.
6
Event plausibility does not determine children's false memories.事件的似真性并不能决定儿童的错误记忆。
Memory. 2006 Nov;14(8):937-51. doi: 10.1080/09658210600896105.
7
Adults' memories of childhood: true and false reports.成年人对童年的记忆:真实与虚假的报告。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Dec;14(4):373-91. doi: 10.1037/a0014309.
8
Cognitive mechanisms underlying recovered-memory experiences of childhood sexual abuse.童年性虐待恢复记忆体验背后的认知机制。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):92-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02247.x. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
9
Strategies for verifying false autobiographical memories.验证错误自传体记忆的策略。
Am J Psychol. 2005 Winter;118(4):587-602.
10
Trying to recollect past events: confidence, beliefs, and memories.尝试回忆过去的事件:信心、信念与记忆。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2005 Nov;25(7):917-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.03.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Memory distrust and imagination inflation: A registered report.记忆不信任与想象膨胀:一项预注册报告。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 1;20(8):e0327638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327638. eCollection 2025.
2
Examining the effects of mood and emotional valence on the creation of false autobiographical memories.考察情绪和情感效价对错误自传体记忆形成的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Mar 5. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01697-x.
3
Research Review: Why do prospective and retrospective measures of maltreatment differ? A narrative review.研究综述:为什么前瞻性和回顾性的虐待测量结果不同?叙述性综述。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;65(12):1662-1677. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14048. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
4
False memories in forensic psychology: do cognition and brain activity tell the same story?法医心理学中的错误记忆:认知与大脑活动是否讲述相同的故事?
Front Psychol. 2024 May 16;15:1327196. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1327196. eCollection 2024.
5
Do cognitive abilities reduce eyewitness susceptibility to the misinformation effect? A systematic review.认知能力能否降低目击者对错误信息效应的易感性?一项系统综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2410-2436. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02512-5. Epub 2024 May 2.
6
Memory distrust and imagination inflation: A registered report.记忆不信任与想象膨胀:一份注册报告。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 7;19(2):e0297774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297774. eCollection 2024.
7
Implanting rich autobiographical false memories: Meta-analysis for forensic practice and judicial judgment making.植入丰富的自传体虚假记忆:法医实践和司法判决的元分析
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023 Oct-Dec;23(4):100386. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100386. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
8
Pedunculopontine-induced cortical decoupling as the neurophysiological locus of dissociation.被盖脚桥核诱导的大脑皮质去耦作为分离的神经生理学位置。
Psychol Rev. 2023 Jan;130(1):183-210. doi: 10.1037/rev0000353. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
9
Linking creativity and false memory: Common consequences of a flexible memory system.连接创造力和错误记忆:灵活记忆系统的共同后果。
Cognition. 2021 Dec;217:104905. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104905. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
10
Rich false memories of autobiographical events can be reversed.丰富的自传体事件虚假记忆可以被反转。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 30;118(13). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026447118.