• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根管封闭剂的pH值测量

pH measurement of root canal sealers.

作者信息

Huang T H, Kao C T

机构信息

Dental Department, Chung Shan Medical and Dental College, Taiwan, Republic of China.

出版信息

J Endod. 1998 Apr;24(4):236-8. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80103-9.

DOI:10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80103-9
PMID:9641125
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the surface pH level of three different type sealers after mixing at various time intervals in vitro. The cements were mixed according to the manufacturer's instructions. They were incubated to set in 100% humidity at 37 degrees C for 1 h, 24 h, 5 days, 8 days, 2 wk, 3 wk, 4 wk, 5 wk, and 7 wk. pH was calculated by a Twin pH meter. The pH levels of the three sealers were different at various time intervals (p < 0.0001). The resin-based cement had a acid pH level (pH < 7.0). The calcium hydroxide-based cement showed a higher alkalinity pH level (pH > 7.0). The zinc oxide-eugenol-based cement showed a similar pH level to the calcium hydroxide cement at the end of the measurement. We postulated that, in endodontic therapy when those healing is needed, the alkaline-based sealer is the choice.

摘要

本研究的目的是在体外比较三种不同类型封闭剂在不同时间间隔混合后的表面pH值水平。这些水门汀按照制造商的说明进行混合。将它们在37℃、100%湿度下孵育凝固1小时、24小时、5天、8天、2周、3周、4周、5周和7周。通过双pH计计算pH值。三种封闭剂在不同时间间隔的pH值水平不同(p<0.0001)。树脂基水门汀的pH值呈酸性(pH<7.0)。氢氧化钙基水门汀显示出较高的碱性pH值水平(pH>7.0)。在测量结束时,氧化锌-丁香酚基水门汀显示出与氢氧化钙水门汀相似的pH值水平。我们推测,在需要愈合的牙髓治疗中,碱性封闭剂是首选。

相似文献

1
pH measurement of root canal sealers.根管封闭剂的pH值测量
J Endod. 1998 Apr;24(4):236-8. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80103-9.
2
A comparative evaluation of sealing ability of rootcanal sealers.根管封闭剂封闭能力的比较评估
Indian J Dent Res. 2002 Jan-Mar;13(1):31-6.
3
Adhesion of endodontic sealers to dentin and gutta-percha.根管封闭剂与牙本质和牙胶的黏附
J Endod. 2002 Oct;28(10):684-8. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200210000-00002.
4
Effect of ultrasonic vibration and various sealer and cement combinations on titanium post removal.超声振动以及各种封闭剂与水门汀组合对钛桩取出的影响。
J Endod. 2001 Jan;27(1):13-7. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200101000-00004.
5
Effect of various mixing ratios on antibacterial properties and hardness of endodontic sealers.不同混合比例对根管封闭剂抗菌性能和硬度的影响。
J Endod. 2000 Sep;26(9):519-22. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200009000-00008.
6
Evaluation of Er:YAG laser and EDTAC on dentin adhesion of six endodontic sealers.铒钇铝石榴石激光和乙二胺四乙酸对六种根管封闭剂牙本质黏附性的评估。
Braz Dent J. 2001;12(1):27-30.
7
A comparison of the effect of three endodontic sealers on adherence of mouse peritoneal macrophages.三种根管封闭剂对小鼠腹腔巨噬细胞黏附作用的比较
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2001 Sep;29(9):673-7.
8
The pH changes of four different root canal sealers after mixing at various time intervals in vitro.四种不同根管封闭剂在体外不同时间间隔混合后的pH值变化。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2004 Nov 15;5(4):71-8.
9
Apical leakage of four endodontic sealers.四种根管充填封闭剂的根尖渗漏情况
J Endod. 2003 Mar;29(3):208-10. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200303000-00011.
10
Effects of eugenol and noneugenol endodontic sealer cements on post retention.丁香酚和非丁香酚根管封闭剂对桩固位的影响。
J Endod. 1998 Aug;24(8):564-7. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80079-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of physicochemical properties of various root canal sealers: An study.各种根管封闭剂物理化学性质的比较评价:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Apr;28(4):325-330. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_866_24. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
2
Evaluating the antimicrobial effectiveness of endodontic sealers against oral pathogens associated with failed root canal treatments.评估根管封闭剂对与根管治疗失败相关的口腔病原体的抗菌效果。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Mar;28(3):264-268. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_841_24. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
3
Physicochemical Properties of Two Generations of MTA-Based Root Canal Sealers.
两代基于MTA的根管封闭剂的物理化学性质
Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 9;14(20):5911. doi: 10.3390/ma14205911.