Savonenko A V, Danilets A V, Zieliński K
Institute of Mental Health, Russian Acedemy of Medical Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova. 1998 Mar-Apr;48(2):240-50.
Two-way active avoidance learning is a complex task characterized by a high level of interindividual variability. We have demonstrated in our previous paper that rats with different rate of learning vary in expression of freezing responses, which reflects a conflict tendency not to re-enter the previous chock compartment [4]. In the present work we analyzed as main indices the proportions of avoidance, rapid escape, and freezing responses and their distribution within a session. Sequences of occurrence of these three types of responses were examined in groups of rats with different success of avoidance learning. The obtained results confirmed a hypothesis that overcoming the conflict tendency was a separate stage of learning which preceded avoidance response appearance and subsequent stabilization. Only in rats which failed to learn and develop avoidance responses within the first session, freezing responses were observed in successive session being indicative of reappearance of the conflict tendency. The intensity of the conflict tendency did not depend on the type of the first response of an animal (fleeing or freezing) to an unexpected aversive stimulus.
双向主动回避学习是一项复杂的任务,其特点是个体间差异程度较高。我们在之前的论文中已经证明,学习速度不同的大鼠在僵住反应的表达上存在差异,这反映了一种不重新进入先前电击隔室的冲突倾向[4]。在本研究中,我们将回避、快速逃避和僵住反应的比例及其在一个实验环节中的分布作为主要指标进行分析。在回避学习成功率不同的大鼠组中,检查了这三种反应类型的出现顺序。获得的结果证实了一个假设,即克服冲突倾向是学习的一个独立阶段,它先于回避反应的出现及随后的稳定。只有在第一实验环节中未能学会并形成回避反应的大鼠中,才会在后续实验环节中观察到僵住反应,这表明冲突倾向再次出现。冲突倾向的强度并不取决于动物对意外厌恶刺激的首次反应类型(逃跑或僵住)。